republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Porn-free Utah » LOL!
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
p2p »
« Censorship!  
xirian
Premium
join:2003-01-26
Beacon, NY

Re: Bureaucratic nightmare for an ISP

Since its just blocking a list of porn sites, Id think they'd just send all the http traffic through a transparent proxy.

reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL

Re: Bureaucratic nightmare for an ISP

Which would have a bit of overhead. I hope it doesn't add too much though.

nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy

Re: Bureaucratic nightmare for an ISP

said by reub2000 See Profile:

Which would have a bit of overhead. I hope it doesn't add too much though.
Use of proxies can improve web content viewing. That's the whole premise behind a content-accelerator: you proxy a group of users behind a caching device. The first person to visit a site experiences a small access-time penalty (generally not something noticeable). All subsequent visitors for the target site fetch content from the local cache, not the remote site. Therefore, their fetches are done from closer hosts, thereby accelerating downloads (since the fetches are only going one or two hops, not tens of hops).

-tom
--
"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased)

reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL

Re: Bureaucratic nightmare for an ISP

What about dynamic content. How would it detect that?

Othello235

@silvereaglemfg.com

Re: Bureaucratic nightmare for an ISP

As long as the page is written correctly, the author will have included a tag noting the dynamic content, which will then not be cached

reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL

Re: Bureaucratic nightmare for an ISP

But what if a page was not properly marked as dynamic? I'd be POed if I couldn't see new posts on one of my favorite forums. If I wanted caching, I'd just run squid on my server.

Also, how would a web cache detect http traffic? Would it just pass all port 80 traffic. What about sites on port 83? What about sites on port 1351 or 8684?

nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy

said by reub2000 See Profile:

What about dynamic content. How would it detect that?
Ask th folks at Oracle. They seem to think that their cache-engine properly handles dynamic content.

-tom
--
"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased)
Forums » Porn-free Utahp2p »
« Censorship!  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 23:15:22 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [100] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [81] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [39] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [32] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [16] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Rant] Damn Sermons through my speakers! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Mysterious $800 Cash Deposit? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· NDP - Jack Layton email on broadband [TekSavvy]
· hawaii in thanksgiving [General Questions]
· Came from FIOS to Comcast and.....I'm glad I did! [Comcast HSI]
· Child Porn Laws - The Traci Lords Argument [Canadian Chat]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Gizmo5 has added a Google Voice section in its members area. [VOIP Tech Chat]