Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » California ISP's Urge SBC to Get Naked » Those ISP's will drive up prices.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Pffft »
« Spinoff ISP services//Transport only  
AuthorAll Replies

vavoiper

join:2005-03-08
Falls Church, VA

 reply to john262
Re: Those ISP's will drive up prices.

Yes, but if you let them have control of the market now, they will eventually raise prices...as monopolists always do (see 2 threads down on VZ's recent price increases). It's called Predatory Pricing, that is, using one's monopolistic position to lower prices to the detriment of competitors, and is illegal...if it can be proven.

john262

join:2003-09-26
Elko, NV
·Wireless Beehive

Yes, I know all about predatory pricing. But if they raise their prices later people can always disconnect from them and get cable broadband or wireless. You see, as long as cable is out there and wireless is up and coming, they can't be called a monopoly.

The bottom line is that their $19.95 price is allowing many people to get broadband who otherwise couldn't afford it. How can that not be a good thing?


KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Speakeasy

As long as the customer has the option of cable or wireless, that's not a bad argument.
For me, there's no wireless provider around, so cable would be my only choice.
Hmmm, a choice between the local ILEC monopoly or the local cable monopoly - not much of a choice. I'm glad I can go to one of seven local supermarkets, one of 12 different gas stations, etc. around here for choices and deals. Having a choice of two monopolies is not really much of a choice...
KM
--
eLearning and Website Design | Need an LMS? | Need an LMS & eCommerce solution?

vavoiper

join:2005-03-08
Falls Church, VA
reply to john262
Who else can one call for business voice in most metropolitan areas. It ain't cable & it ain't wireless, in fact it ain't anybody but the monopoly ILEC.

john262

join:2003-09-26
Elko, NV
·Wireless Beehive

I'm not going to debate the merits or lack of merits of monopolies here, but I do know that a lot of people long for the less complicated days when AT&T had an unfettered nationwide monopoly. There are arguments on both sides of this issue, but generally I will go with whatever system provides consumers with the lowest possible price.

Right now that's SBC in many areas.

If SBC starts to abuse their position too much in the future they can always be subjected to subsequent regulations.
Forums » California ISP's Urge SBC to Get Naked Pffft »
« Spinoff ISP services//Transport only  


Sunday, 08-Nov 17:05:18 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Please Help, I think my computer is being monitored [Security]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]