Re: Now only if we had another PhD candidate

Author	All Replies
DonLibes Premium,ExMod 2001 join:2003-01-19	reply to oliphant Re: Now only if we had another PhD candidate This should be easy to block. Just run a little daemon that randomly adjusts your system time (backwards and forwards) by a few milliseconds every so often.
DonLibes Premium,ExMod 2001 join:2003-01-19	to forum · permalink · · 2005-03-04 14:10:05 ·
TK Junk Mail Go ahead, make my day Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs: ·Comcast	said by DonLibes : This should be easy to block. Just run a little daemon that randomly adjusts your system time (backwards and forwards) by a few milliseconds every so often. Or turn off timestamps with DrTcp as shown in this post: »Block timestamps using BBR's DrTCP stops method -- My Web Page My Blog Join Red Room Forum
	to forum · permalink · · 2005-03-04 14:13:19 ·
Overhere @65.185.x.x	From what I understand, with Windows boxes.... 1. Windows Client connects to our discovery device (this could be a web site etc...) 2. Windows client has timestamps turned off. syn/ack begins. 3. discovery device replies to the windows box with timestamp information included. 4. Windows box ignores that timestamps are turned off and decides to send timestamps in return. Hummmm windows is such a smart OS. Then fingerprinting can begin. Still unsure of even if this method of fingerprinting is valid but I would assure you that if it is, it will not be patched by OS vendors if the vunerability is patched it may defeat the efforts of our goverment. May I remind everyone of the Patroit Act.
Overhere @65.185.x.x	to forum · permalink · 2005-03-10 21:55:49 ·


Friday, 05-Dec 04:21:34	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF