Hayward
K A R - 1 2 0 C
Premium
join:2000-07-13
Key West, FL
| reply to damox
Re: Here We Go Again
To each their own... 3mbs is plenty (sure I might like more now and then) but reliability and that it is ALWAYS there when I need it (which cable around here is NOT) are far more important issues to me.
(Also why I don't have cable for TV either)
--
»haywardm.com (Hayward's Key West) |
|
damox
Premium
join:2002-01-07
Olympia, WA
 ·Comcast Formerly ..
1 edit | reply to Hayward
You and I are not even in the same conversation here. You are talking about number of users, My main point is bang for your buck! Truly, I look forward to the day when DSL will trounce cable! When that happens, we'll have some truly awesome bandwidth! Until then, I'll just keep my cable plugged in. If I could get the same bandwidth for a similar price from DSL, I'd switch back in a moment! Unfortunately, I'd don't foresee that happening anytime soon.
--
DAMOX Proud to be a member of Team Discovery |
|
Hayward
K A R - 1 2 0 C
Premium
join:2000-07-13
Key West, FL
1 edit | reply to damox
said by damox  : The reason DSL has fallen behind is because their offerings are falling behind. DSL is NOT falling behind, it has ALWAYS been behind and it is actually GAINING in the recent past as distance technology and speed has gotten better.
Can't figure out what 30% is??? Well lets see... how much behind is 13 mil subs compared to 19 mil subs?
--
»haywardm.com (Hayward's Key West)
|
|
damox
Premium
join:2002-01-07
Olympia, WA
·Comcast Formerly ..
| reply to Hayward
said by Hayward : 30% is SO far behind??? (And actually its a gain) Lots of subscribers, does not necessarily make something good or great.
Lots of people bought PINTO's... didn't make them a great car.
What is 30%? Not sure what you are talking about. The best I can get from Qwest here in Washington, is 1.5 down and 896 up. That's for $30. While it's not to bad, Comcast is now offering 4 Mbits down and 384 up for $47 (which includes the cost of renting a modem) or for $10 more I can get 6 Mbit down and 640 up!
When I had DSL a while back, I had 3 different carriers and the best I could get is 640/256, and at that time, it cost $40. While they've improved a bit, I've been far more satisifed since I went with Comcast. I guess it's all in where you live!
said by Hayward :Lots of subscribers, does not necessarily make something good or great. Lots of people bought PINTO's... didn't make them a great car. Again, I'm not sure what you are talking about. The reason DSL has fallen behind is because their offerings are falling behind. That is why cable is beating them! My point is that I am hoping that DSL Bandwidth will increase to the point where prices for cable will come down. I don't really care whether I have dsl or cable, I just want the best product for the best price! As far as I'm concerned, I wish dsl were twice as popular as cable, because then the prices for cable would fall!
--
DAMOX Proud to be a member of Team Discovery |
|
Hayward
K A R - 1 2 0 C
Premium
join:2000-07-13
Key West, FL
| reply to damox
said by damox : Too bad DSL has fallen so far behind. I hope DSL starts catching up quickly! GO DSL! 30% is SO far behind??? (And actually its a gain)
Lots of subscribers, does not necessarily make something good or great.
Lots of people bought PINTO's... didn't make them a great car.
--
»haywardm.com (Hayward's Key West) |
|
