BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
clubs:
 ·Cox HSI
| reply to Jeremy341
Re: Bad move
said by Jeremy341  : said by BillRoland :Flash OFDM clearly kicks the crap out of EVDO. Why would anyone want to pick 2nd place (the first loser)? Flash OFDM may very well be better than EV-DO, but who can I get it from? Oh that's right, it's not available. EV-DO wins by default, because Flash OFDM isn't available, and EV-DO is. I was speaking about cell companies, not a consumer like you. And besides, that is completely irrelevant to my post. The fact that a brand new technology, which is better than EV-DO, is not as ubiquitous as EV-DO, is completely irrelevant.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition." |
|
Jeremy341
Bye
Premium
join:2000-01-06
localhost
| said by BillRoland :The fact that a brand new technology, which is better than EV-DO, is not as ubiquitous as EV-DO, is completely irrelevant. Brand new? Hardly.
As to wanting to know the cellular companies' side of the equation, DrTCP summed it up quite nicely. |
|
BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
clubs: | Oh you're right, Flash OFDM has been out since the 1980s. My mistake.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition." |
|
Jeremy341
Bye
Premium
join:2000-01-06
localhost
| said by BillRoland :Oh you're right, Flash OFDM has been out since the 1980s. My mistake. No need to be sarcastic. It's been around since 2000. You were calling it "brand new" compared to EV-DO, which has also been around since 2000. Neither one is brand new, and both are actually about the same age. |
|
