  Steve I'm a PC, so shut up Consultant join:2001-03-10 Yorba Linda, CA
| reply to bleearg13 Re: New Juniper code, too
said by bleearg13 : There is no need for mass hysteria, because if one gets their internet service from a "Tier 1" ISP, or even a "Tier 2" ISP who needs service from a Tier 1, the problem is already taken care of. Not if you have a Juniper that hasn't been patched... -- Stephen J. Friedl Unix Wizard Microsoft Security MVP Tustin, California USA my web site |
|
 smcallah
join:2004-08-05 Home
| said by Steve : said by bleearg13 : There is no need for mass hysteria, because if one gets their internet service from a "Tier 1" ISP, or even a "Tier 2" ISP who needs service from a Tier 1, the problem is already taken care of. Not if you have a Juniper that hasn't been patched... You won't really find too many non-Tier 1 ISP's that use Junipers. Juniper doesn't really make any "small" routers. Their smallest router is still a 2.5/5 Gig backplane. No one needs all that for their T1's, or even T3's... not even their OC3, unless they've got a need for 16 OC3's in one box. And that doesn't sound like a "small" ISP. |
|
  Steve I'm a PC, so shut up Consultant join:2001-03-10 Yorba Linda, CA
| said by smcallah : You won't really find too many non-Tier 1 ISP's that use Junipers. The webhosting operation where I'm on staff has two of them, and the router guy (a JCNIE) is making an onsite visit today to perform this upgrade.
Steve -- Stephen J. Friedl Unix Wizard Microsoft Security MVP Tustin, California USA my web site |
|
  BeesTea Network Janitor Premium,VIP join:2003-03-08 00000
| reply to smcallah Border capacity isn't the only factor when considering router back-plane needs. We use Junipers inside our borders as part of our BGP-based policy system. They have no outside connection to them at all.
Cheers, -BeesT -- echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D4D465452snlb xq |dc |
|