republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » New DC ++ Version : Watch out
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Homograph phishers diversifying? »
« Possible issue with Symantec AntiVirus  
AuthorAll Replies


John2g
Qui Tacet Consentit
Premium
join:2001-08-10
England

reply to TerryMiller
Re: New DC ++ Version : Watch out

said by TerryMiller See Profile:

I only have KAV so I downloaded and submitted to jotti. I trust McAfee so I wonder if this is really a false positive.

File: DCPlusPlus-0.668.exe
Status:
INFECTED/MALWARE (Note: this file has been scanned before. Therefore, this file's scan results will not be stored in the database)
Packers detected:
PE_PATCH, TELOCK

This may be the reason. BOCLean detected a trojan in Autostream because of TELOCK. This is the explanation.

QUOTE

"Greetings ... interesting indeed. Well ... it's a false positive, but then again it is *NOT* a false positive. BOClean triggered on a behavioral basis for that one since it was somehow STUPIDLY compacted with the same whacky version of the trojan compactor known as TELock ... that's what BOClean triggered on, last known sighting of this particular version of TELock was back in late 2003 with the SOBIG worms."

"Autostreamer" itself is clean, but the programmers stupidly used TELock which is ONLY used with trojans to obscure them from file scanners. I'm going to have to guess that this was the author's idea of securing himself from "reverse engineering" - I can't imagine any legitimate reason to have used that otherwise, and it IS a known trojan packer.

Since the SOBIG.F virus is EXTINCT, we'll remove that definition from the BOClean database as the SOBIG.F "worm" cannot function any longer and thus the definition is no longer required. Howver, the author(s) of this utility DID use a trojan packer and that's what BOClean alerted on as the particular output was HIGHLY unique."

ENDQUOTE
--
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.


amysheehan
Premium,VIP,MVM
join:1999-12-21
Huntington Beach, CA
·RoadRunner Cable


1 edit
reply to Wildcatboy
The copy of Ad-aware that I downloaded from download.com last night was reeking havoc on my computer and I tested it again just now at Jotti after reading this thread:

File: Ad-Aware.exe
Status: MIGHT BE INFECTED/MALWARE (Sandbox emulation took a long time and/or runtime packers were found, this is suspicious. Normally programs aren't packed and don't force the sandbox into lengthy emulation. Do realize no scanner issued any warning, the file can very well be harmless. Caution is advised, however.) (Note: this file has been scanned before. Therefore, this file's scan results will not be stored in the database)
Packers detected: ASPACK

NOTE: I had problems trying to download same file from Major Geeks and the download.com site download left a strange dll in my temp folder that Norton picked up when I rebooted my computer.


Franfreluche

@sympatico.ca

reply to TerryMiller
I seriously doubt that a false positive would try to mess my registry settings and drop the cserv32.exe file in the C:\Windows folder.

Also , the guy that wrote the first review on download.com said that it had installed bargain , ist search and a browser hijacker.I definitively think that it's true.

It's too bad that i have deleted the cserv32.exe in a haste though.I could have submitted it to NOD32 and the other AV companies because it look like only 2 of them can detect it.(according to your tests).


Wildcatboy
Premium,Mod
join:2000-10-30
Toronto, ON
reply to TerryMiller

Thanks Terry. I have a feeling it's a false positive too.


TerryMiller
Premium
join:2003-10-23

reply to Franfreluche
I only have KAV so I downloaded and submitted to jotti. I trust McAfee so I wonder if this is really a false positive.

File: DCPlusPlus-0.668.exe
Status:
INFECTED/MALWARE (Note: this file has been scanned before. Therefore, this file's scan results will not be stored in the database)
Packers detected:
PE_PATCH, TELOCK

AntiVir
No viruses found (0.19 seconds taken)
Avast
No viruses found (1.51 seconds taken)
BitDefender
Trojan.Downloader.IstBar.ER (2.62 seconds taken)
ClamAV
No viruses found (0.78 seconds taken)
Dr.Web
No viruses found (0.54 seconds taken)
F-Prot Antivirus
No viruses found (0.07 seconds taken)
Kaspersky Anti-Virus
Trojan.Win32.Krepper.ag, Trojan-Dropper.Win32.Agent.el (1.89 seconds taken)
mks_vir
No viruses found (0.24 seconds taken)
NOD32
No viruses found (0.40 seconds taken)
Norman Virus Control
No viruses found (0.13 seconds taken)
--
Michelle Graduates
Thread is
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityHomograph phishers diversifying? »
« Possible issue with Symantec AntiVirus  


Saturday, 28-Nov 03:02:42 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [71] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [66] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [50] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DIR-655 New Beta 1.32b09 [D-Link]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· [ Classes] 3.2.2 Rogue [World of Warcraft]
· Nvidia Forceware for Windows XP\2000\03 195.62 [Software]
· [Newsgroups] Any partial search engines besides Newzleech? [Filesharing Software]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]