Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Norvergence » Let the non-NYers know who he is.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

clecrupt9

join:2002-01-22
GA

reply to JPCass
Re: Spitzer is THE MAN.

said by JPCass See Profile:

said by garmst See Profile:


Spitzer didn't go after Norvergence, he went after the finance companies that loaned the customers the money to buy the equipment. Spitzer went after an innocent party who had nothing to do with the crime.
Finance companies have some duty, if only to themselves and their shareholders, to be sure that they are not involved in unconscionable transactions that amongst other liabilities run a higher risk of default.
Thats right- What higher risk can you have than doing business with a company that can attract a State AG on your tail.

But you know, everyday there is a big financial institution in trouble over something.

garmst

join:2000-09-17
New York, NY

The risk for banks is irresponsible people who make bad financial decisions, will not take responsibility for them and call upon a thug with the power of government to make them whole at an innocent parties expense.

Maybe the banks will have to "redline screen" for deadbeat, crybaby customers and not lend money to them.


jerr123



Where you are missing the point is that Norvergence sold the consumer a "total solution" that guaranteed a cost savings. The "package" could not be bought unless the consumer rented the "Matrix" box. The consumer was not leasing the box for a period of time at the end of which he would own it. This was not a leasing arrangement. Norvergence perpetrated this scam on the leasing companies as well as the end user. The leasing companies recourse is to go after Norvergence and not try to recoup their loss from the consumer. The consumer has a right to stop their payments if they are not getting the "total solution" promised them.


JoshNJ
Premium
join:2001-12-25
Freehold, NJ


1 edit
said by jerr123:

The consumer has a right to stop their payments if they are not getting the "total solution" promised them.
no they don't, if the money is laid out by the bank and not norvergence, the customer needs to follow by what they agreed to pay. the bank didn't scam anyone.
--
I support the RIAA
Forums » Norvergence


Sunday, 08-Nov 15:57:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· [Need Info] Looking for backup software... [Software]
· Why do they traumatize kids in Phys. Ed. in school? [Canadian Chat]
· Please Help, I think my computer is being monitored [Security]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· Clear vs. Energy Efficient Windows (Motorola Modem) [Clearwire]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]