how-to block ads
|
John2g
Qui Tacet Consentit
Premium
join:2001-08-10
England
| US company fined for UK rogue dialler scam
»www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/17···is_fine/
By Tim Richardson
Published Wednesday 17th November 2004 12:49 GMT
A company based in New York has been fined £100,000 ($185,500) for ripping off UK punters with a premium rate number scam. Some 850 people complained to watchdog ICSTIS that B&B Services LLC had caused them to run up huge phone bills while connected to the internet. People claimed that dialler software installed on their PCs made repeated internet calls without their knowledge or consent.
Although B&B Services, which ran an adult service, denied that its dialler software had connected to premium rate numbers without users' consent, ICSTIS fined the US company £100,000, ordered it to refund those out of pocket and barred access to the service for two years.
Another New York-based company - BW Telecom - was also fined £100,000 for continuing to run its online adult entertainment service even though it was barred last year. The US company had been fined £75,000 ($139,000) for spamming punters with porn emails that led to users racking up whopping phone bills. The spam sent by BW Telecom contained peak-rate dialler software which disconnected users from their ISP before reconnecting them to a service that charged them £1.50 a minute for Net access.
These fines are the latest in a crackdown by the regulator against internet dialler scams which defraud consumers by secretly changing their computer settings so they call a premium rate phone line instead of their usual ISP number.
In its latest list of actions taken against rogue premium rate operators, ICSTIS also fingered Liechtenstein-based adult entertainment operator DDD Com AG for also running an internet dialler scam. Twenty one people complained that dialler software installed on their computers without their knowledge had led to repeated calls to a premium rate number. The company was fined £60,000 and barred from running the service for two years.
Four weeks ago 11 companies were barred from running premium rate internet dialler services as part of a crackdown on scammers ripping off UK punters. Another 33 companies also face the chop after premium rate watchdog ICSTIS used emergency powers to tackle the growing problem of rogue diallers.
Said ICSTIS director George Kidd: "We have only granted permission to those companies that satisfy our stringent requirements, covering key areas such as clear terms and conditions, user consent, information about how to delete diallers, and responsibility for customer refunds. Any company we find running a dialler without our permission will be cut off immediately." ®
--
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. | |
Doctor Four
My other vehicle is a TARDIS
Premium
join:2000-09-05
Dallas, TX
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·AT&T Yahoo
| $185,550 is too small a fine. I say throw the book at
them. If you've ever been to »www.ripoffreport.com/ ,
you should read about a similar dialler scam from a
company called Alyon Technologies. In fact I think it
the story was profiled at one time in the Scambusters
forum.
--
"Kayura or Badamon, whichever you are, you should know that I will never give up this battle. By the will of the Ancient, I shall succeed!" - Shuten (Anubis) from the Ronin Warriors. | |
Bobby_Peru
Premium
join:2003-06-16
4 edits | Thanks for the post John2g  . It's good to see some action being taken against this type of large scale theft.
I agree with Doctor Four . Even fines that seem large in absolute terms mean little when criminals, or potential criminals, balance the chances of getting caught at some future point, then the chances of getting fined, and then the chances of personal vs. corporate liability for any such fines, and then the chances of the fines being thrown out, overturned, or reduced with the certainty of the profits each day at midnight (or on what ever schedule their chosen merchant service provider or Telecom "partner" transfers each period's bounty). It's the same with other corporate and/or governmental malfeasance (or crime), which is all to often conducted on a gargantuan scale.
This article mentions that at least one of these collection of scumbags is a repeat offender, and even operating their scams under the same corporate name.
Until the risk becomes much greater certainty of serious jail-time for all those knowingly involved in these activities, this will continue, and probably only escalate.
--
**~~Infected/Hijacked? FAQ~~~Protect/Secure Your Box/Data FAQ~~~Security Forum FAQs~~** | |
|
