boredMDer
Premium
join:2002-09-22
Pasadena, MD | reply to StingerMoD
Re: What do you recomend for FTP
/usr/bin/ftp |
|
hailinfantry
Bizarro Quinn
Premium
join:2004-01-18
Brooklyn, NY
| said by boredMDer  :/usr/bin/ftp Exactly!
What on earth is wrong with "Terminal" -> "ftp"? (Unless you want a GUI) |
|
bobrk
Posting tag
Premium
join:2000-02-02
San Jose, CA
 ·SONIC.NET
| said by hailinfantry : said by boredMDer :/usr/bin/ftp Exactly! What on earth is wrong with "Terminal" -> "ftp"? (Unless you want a GUI) Exactly. Drag'n'drop is nice if you're uploading a whole website or a bunch of pictures. Especially if you have nested folders. I don't thing mput or mget in ftp will do that. You'd have to go through the tar/untar process to do it in any kind of efficient way.
--
bobrk |
|
hailinfantry
Bizarro Quinn
Premium
join:2004-01-18
Brooklyn, NY
| said by bobrk : said by hailinfantry : said by boredMDer :/usr/bin/ftp Exactly! What on earth is wrong with "Terminal" -> "ftp"? (Unless you want a GUI) Exactly. Drag'n'drop is nice if you're uploading a whole website or a bunch of pictures. Especially if you have nested folders. I don't thing mput or mget in ftp will do that. You'd have to go through the tar/untar process to do it in any kind of efficient way. Efficient is relative. I'd be willing to wager a UNIX or VMS guru could toss that crap up via ftp a lot faster than some kiddie with his graphical FTP client.
--
Leon: No, I forget sometimes.. you see, my old manager at the Orange Julius is named Doug, and, uh.. anyway, I think I should tell you, the.. uh.. computer you're looking at is for gays.Customer: What?! |
|
bobrk
Posting tag
Premium
join:2000-02-02
San Jose, CA
·SONIC.NET
| said by hailinfantry : said by bobrk : said by hailinfantry : said by boredMDer :/usr/bin/ftp Exactly! What on earth is wrong with "Terminal" -> "ftp"? (Unless you want a GUI) Exactly. Drag'n'drop is nice if you're uploading a whole website or a bunch of pictures. Especially if you have nested folders. I don't thing mput or mget in ftp will do that. You'd have to go through the tar/untar process to do it in any kind of efficient way. Efficient is relative. I'd be willing to wager a UNIX or VMS guru could toss that crap up via ftp a lot faster than some kiddie with his graphical FTP client. As a member of both clubs, I would have to concur that it depends.
--
bobrk |
|
hailinfantry
Bizarro Quinn
Premium
join:2004-01-18
Brooklyn, NY
| said by bobrk : said by hailinfantry : said by bobrk : said by hailinfantry : said by boredMDer :/usr/bin/ftp Exactly! What on earth is wrong with "Terminal" -> "ftp"? (Unless you want a GUI) Exactly. Drag'n'drop is nice if you're uploading a whole website or a bunch of pictures. Especially if you have nested folders. I don't thing mput or mget in ftp will do that. You'd have to go through the tar/untar process to do it in any kind of efficient way. Efficient is relative. I'd be willing to wager a UNIX or VMS guru could toss that crap up via ftp a lot faster than some kiddie with his graphical FTP client. As a member of both clubs, I would have to concur that it depends. That's why you're the man  .
--
Leon: No, I forget sometimes.. you see, my old manager at the Orange Julius is named Doug, and, uh.. anyway, I think I should tell you, the.. uh.. computer you're looking at is for gays.Customer: What?! |
|
