sorne guy
@milwwi.ameritech | reply to Ryno
Re: BPL is Faux Broadband
i'd buy it just to piss off all the ham operators that ramble on and on about 911 and how emergency services need them and and blah blah blah
if possible, i'd like turn up the interference, maybe with some steel rails under my lawn |
|
wolfox
Gentle Wolfox
join:2002-11-27
Dunnellon, FL
| What a sad, small man you must be to do things in the venue of upsetting your neighbors and precipitating angst amongst your peers. Doubly so for being anonymous. Enjoy your minuscule, heartless existence my friend...
--
Nothwest Arkansas' ONLY all Techno Radio Webcast, powered by SBC DSL! |
|
hrobins
Premium
join:2000-10-15
Regina, SK
clubs:
| reply to sorne guy
I agree with Wolfox, what a sad man. Thing is if you turn up the interference, The FCC would come after you. Ham Radio is under part 23 if I recall right. BPL is under part 13???
We have to be liceased to use our part of the radio band, and ham radio has a higher prioitry then BPL. In other words, you cause interference, not only would the BPL be turned off you would be facing some serious fines.
Howard Robinson
KG4GSN/VE5GSN
ARES/Skywarn |
|
szoruba
join:2004-07-25
Tinley Park, IL
|  reply to sorne guy
Go BPL! The sooner, the better. And don't trash people who do public service.
If you caused such interference, you would be breaking an FCC rule, which is punishable by fines and/or prison time.
A ham radio operator was able to communicate during a hurricane disaster (when the phone lines were down) and able to direct medical assistance to me. He saved my life!!!
How stupid can someone be to post their illegal intenions?
Ask Mommy to explain this to you  |
|
