Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Telecommuters Not Trusted » Zombies
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
restrictions by a Fortune 500 company on VPN »
AuthorAll Replies


TamaraB
Question The Current Paradigm
Premium
join:2000-11-08
Brooklyn NYC
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to Nightfall
Re: Zombies

said by Nightfall See Profile:
IT Manager here as well, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to secure a Windows computer, even remotely.
Unfortunately what you can't configure against is the employee who has a jones for some sort of porn, or warez! All the technical forethought can be easily thwarted by one employee who just has to see that snatch, or download that game now and then. Windows has the biggest exploit window of any OS, mainly because of it's overwhelming popularity.

said by Nightfall See Profile:

We have about 20 users who telecommute. Everyone of them is in the office at least once a month. It is easy to set up updates to run on the systems automatically. I am not talking automatic update either. I run these from a custom login script program called Profile Maker by autoprof
Right! And it take all of 20 seconds of vulnerability to get zapped!

said by Nightfall See Profile:

The key is that Linux is no safer than Windows. It all comes down to administration.
Oh but it IS! There are 2 orders of magnitude fewer exploits/worms/viruses which can infect a linux box than a windows box. Windows is the pre-eminent OS in the world, and 99.99% of maleware is designed to attack it, meaning the same attention to patches makes you 2 orders of magnitude safer with Linux. I agree, that technically Linux may not be any more secure inherently; but if you look at your port traffic once in a while you will realize that there is a blizzard of systems attempting to exploit any un-patched windows box on your network.

I also do not want to spend all my time "securing" multiple systems, when there is really no need to. The shear number of new windows exploits is mushrooming daily, and it is almost impossible to totally control any users habits.... even a small time-slip can mean an infected machine. It's too expensive, time-consuming, and I would have less time for fishing

Bob

--
Motor Vessel - Tamara B.
43' Long-Range Trawler
Cape Elizebeth ME.
See her Here.


Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
·Site5.com
·AT&T Midwest
·Comcast

quote:

Unfortunately what you can't configure against is the employee who has a jones for some sort of porn, or warez! All the technical forethought can be easily thwarted by one employee who just has to see that snatch, or download that game now and then. Windows has the biggest exploit window of any OS, mainly because of it's overwhelming popularity.

No offense, but you don't know how to secure a windows platform very well. Think you can't secure a windows system from either of those two things? What if I was to tell you that in our office, we have zero porn and warez site usage? Zero spyware as well. It isn't that hard if you know what you are doing and have the right software and equipment.
quote:

Right! And it take all of 20 seconds of vulnerability to get zapped!

If you aren't patched, then that is a problem. However, patching is easy to do. Major service packs are doled out at the local office. Small packs are sent out remotely as well. So far, after 6 years of using this method, zero exploits and problems.
quote:

Oh but it IS! There are 2 orders of magnitude fewer exploits/worms/viruses which can infect a linux box than a windows box. Windows is the pre-eminent OS in the world, and 99.99% of maleware is designed to attack it, meaning the same attention to patches makes you 2 orders of magnitude safer with Linux. I agree, that technically Linux may not be any more secure inherently; but if you look at your port traffic once in a while you will realize that there is a blizzard of systems attempting to exploit any un-patched windows box on your network.

I am not denying your figures on the attacks. I am saying that it doesn't take hardly any time for me to support these windows boxes. The right admin can secure anything, and with the right technology, it becomes easier. What can be easier than patching 100 systems at one time using a custom GUI login script? You install a client firewall on 100 systems and the policy is doled out from one location and changed at any time. Man, there is a lot of capabilities out there that you don't have any idea about.
quote:

I also do not want to spend all my time "securing" multiple systems, when there is really no need to. The shear number of new windows exploits is mushrooming daily, and it is almost impossible to totally control any users habits.... even a small time-slip can mean an infected machine. It's too expensive, time-consuming, and I would have less time for fishing

I am sorry you feel that way. It is probably your misinformation about how to secure a bulk windows systems. As I said, 6 years here as a manager, no spyware, no exploits, no viruses. It isn't that hard with the right technology, an open mind, a just a little time. I spend more time educating my users than fixing windows problems.

I am sure we can both agree that, with the right administrator, anything is possible. I support 150 systems in my company with almost 200 users total. We have 95% windows systems, and as of yet, I am still learning on how to be as efficient with my linux systems as we are with the windows ones when it comes to updates, protection, and so on. Would a Linux admin have better ideas for me? You bet. However, I would also have to say that maybe, a linux admin would keep an open mind to us Windows admins who know what we are doing.

So while you fish and know you are secure, I will play hockey and feel the same way. We will let our track records speak for themselves. Just keep in mind not to discount us knowledgable windows admins and the capability of securing the windows platform. It isn't as hard as you think with the right admin and technology.
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal


Greg_Z
Premium
join:2001-08-08
Springfield, IL
Nightfall, you could not of stated your facts any better.

No wonder that you have such a wide following.
--
One man's customer loyalty is another man's miguided arrogance.


Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
·Site5.com
·AT&T Midwest
·Comcast

said by Greg_Z See Profile:
Nightfall, you could not of stated your facts any better.

No wonder that you have such a wide following.

A wide following of people who hate me maybe.

Thanks for the kudos though.
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal
Forums » Telecommuters Not Trustedrestrictions by a Fortune 500 company on VPN »


Friday, 27-Nov 01:09:48 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [62] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [56] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [37] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [35] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Not strictly "Home" related - but WOW anyways... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· [Vista] Vista Media Center - DVR-MS vs. WTV [Microsoft Help]