alexm999
join:2003-01-25
Vernon Hills, IL
| reply to lazarus_
Re: Its not a "scam"
If you feel it was a scam, worked for NorV & were let go by NorV then you had it coming. Yes they did run their employees hard, but because they only wanted the best. If were fired, don't take it personally and don't call it a scam. You scare other people into thinking this was an 'evil' company. They did what any other company would do. If I was in charge of a large corporate and profits are down, i'd fire a large amount of employees to streamline operations and to give myself a big bonus. It's capitalism 101.
Don't brand this as a scam because NorV received 5 years of profits upfront. What they did do wrong was pilfer the money away and the Uppermanagement was at fault. They stole or funneled money.
Plane and simple... |
|
Victim
@optonline.net
| reply to lazarus_
The seemingly outrageous amount for the lease was offset by the seemingly outrageously low monthly rate for the service. The scam was the full intention to never continue to deliver the service. The scam was to sell the leases (originally issued directly by Norvergence) to unwitting third party leasing companies, then take the money (paid by the leasing companies to purchase the leases) and run. And a PS to the story, in seems that in at least some instances (like ours), the matrix box in fact was never even hooked up! This is a scam and fraud of the highest, most despicable order. |
|
the regulator
@verizon.n
| reply to lazarus_
Don't be so stupid and naive as to take the position that if you're stupid enough to buy the lease you deserve to get screwed. If a car dealer sold you a new car that happened to be missing a water pump, then overheats and breaks down, do you deserve to lose the whole car because you didn't check to see if all the parts were there? There's something called "implied value" in every business transaction, and that is what Norvergence purposedly did not deliver. Read the Forbes story!!
»msnbc.msn.com/id/5907255/ |
|
