republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » VOIP etc » Voice Over IP - VOIP » VOIP Tech Chat » [Vonage] Vonage And ADT Issue
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[ATT CV] New Firmware? »
« phone connection  
AuthorAll Replies


voiplover
Premium
join:2004-05-28
Portsmouth, NH
·callwithus
·Axvoice


1 edit
reply to bthornhill
Re: [Vonage] Vonage And ADT Issue

If you want your alarm system to call for help, use a pots line
If you need to use a Voip line than ask your alarm company to use 4+2 format with your system.

FC stands for failure to communicate and with the DSC receiver that most monitoring stations that are now handling ADT's alarm signals, they aren't sending the kiss off signal to the subscribers alarm panel due to timing corrupted issues or lost packets. The reason why 4+2 has a better chance of completion is simply because it is pulsing out each digit of the signal. Contact ID is about a 4 second transmission sequence compared a 9 second transmission of 4+2 @ 20pps (~13 seconds completed). 4+2 @ 10pps has an even better chance but takes almost twice as long. Also your voip call is only going to be as good as the weakest link in your connection.

3+1, 4+1, 4+2, silent night slow 10pps and silent night fast 20pps (Napco actually invented 4+2) will probably be the up coming standard again in the alarm industry. If you keep up with with the NFP and your life safety code you should know that SIA is the approved format. Contact ID was designed for wantabe companies to make monitoring stations profitable. Guess what, It's killing them.
The saving feature for voip is providers implementing fax. When the sip server hears a fax tone or anything close (hand shake for 4+2) it will change the codec to 711 high bandwidth and hopefully allow the transmission to be accomplished.

Ademco (now owned by Honeywell) receivers and transmitters have to be able to use SIA to get the fire ratings. They may not offer the programming info in the manuals that you are receiving.

It is in your best interest to standardize on using 4+2 format at least as a back up.
RF (Radio) w/ telco backup is the only wide spread solution.

Just hanging in there to see what happens!


bthornhill

join:2004-05-10
There is no way that 3+1, 4+1 etc will ever become standard again.


voiplover
Premium
join:2004-05-28
Portsmouth, NH
I agree. I just left them in there because of the type of format. 4+2 will only be a format worth holding on to.

"Nobody will ever need more than 540k of memory." Bill Gates
Forums » VOIP etc » Voice Over IP - VOIP » VOIP Tech Chat[ATT CV] New Firmware? »
« phone connection  


Sunday, 08-Nov 14:07:40 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· Odd Memory Issue [Computer Hardware Help]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· [Need Info] Looking for backup software... [Software]
· Know when to run! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· no Globalive/Wind Mobile in Canada [TekSavvy]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]