republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Linksys » using WRT54G as a bridge to another WRT54G
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[wireless] wrt54g port forwarding to wireless »
« [VPN] WRT54g as a VPN Server  

grcore
New and Improved

join:2003-12-06
usa

Re: using WRT54G as a bridge to another WRT54G

said by prestonlewis See Profile:

Yes, all 4 LAN ports work fine in bridge (client) mode. You can add a switch to one of the ports to have even more ports available. I've done that without problems. As for your 2nd question, a WRT54G in client (bridge) mode doesn't care what access point it is using. It just needs to have ssid, channel, encryption, etc. set to match. I don't think it matters which version of firmware you are using. As far as I know, Samahdi, Satori, and Alchemy all work the same when it comes to bridging and the brand of access point used isn't an issue.

with Satori in client mode, only 1 device is allowed to be connected that unit. If you add more it won't work properly.

The client mode of Samahdi and Satori are pretty much the same, Alchemy does thing differently. With Alchemy, the wireless interface becomes the WAN interface of the router. This allows multiple clients to be connected to the client mode WRT (on their own subnet).

When you set a WRT to client mode it loses its ability to be an AP, so devices cannot connect to it via wireless (all devices must be wired to it).

G
pzero

join:2004-10-11
Italy

Re: using WRT54G as a bridge to another WRT54G

said by grcore See Profile:

with Satori in client mode, only 1 device is allowed to be connected that unit. If you add more it won't work properly.
This is a big limitation IMHO, any workaround for it?

The client mode of Samahdi and Satori are pretty much the same, Alchemy does thing differently. With Alchemy, the wireless interface becomes the WAN interface of the router. This allows multiple clients to be connected to the client mode WRT (on their own subnet).
This sounds interesting. Will I still be able to use two WRT54G/WRT54GS boxes to create an ethernet (wifi) bridge between two LANs using the same network (e.g. 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0) on both sides of the bridge.

Any ETA about the Alchemy public release?

Thanks a lot.
digixmax

join:2004-02-11
usa

Re: using WRT54G as a bridge to another WRT54G

I'm been trying to get my new WRT54G running Satori-4.0 to be a client to my old BEFW11S4 without much success. I was able to ping the BEFW11S4 from a PC which is wired to the WRT54G for just a short period of a minute or so during the course of hours of fiddling.

Can someone who has succedeed in using a WRT54G client with another non-WRT54G wireless router post the client setup configuration and procedure?

Thanks.
digixmax

join:2004-02-11
usa

Re: using WRT54G as a bridge to another WRT54G

I just want to report that I am finally able to get my WRT54G in client mode to work with my BEFW11S4. The client WRT is setup based on the guide »homepage.ntlworld.com/linksysinf···UIDE.pdf. The problem I had appears to be due to the use of wireless MAC filtering on the BEFW11S4. For some reason, even adding the MAC addresses of the client WRT and the attached PC to the filter list did not work, but disabling the wireless MAC filtering entirely and then power-cycling the BEFW11S4 did it.
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Linksys[wireless] wrt54g port forwarding to wireless »
« [VPN] WRT54g as a VPN Server  


Thursday, 26-Nov 10:09:06 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [106] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [104] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [68] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [49] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [32] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
· [31] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
Most people now reading
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Telemarketing Hell: Heather's back [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· pfSense vs IPCop vs Zeroshell vs Monowall vs Tomato [TekSavvy]