moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to ctceo
Re: Let's hope so
said by ctceo  :
To date, I have received no complaints from Emergency Service officials in any area that has had a trial cancelled or continued, and that is the first thing they would do if it were an issue.
So you are now the FCC? Complaints must go through you? 
BPL providers, like you, still say there is no interference problem. Not really an un-biased opinion. That coupled with the fact that you, yourself, refuse to divulge any testing methods or results while the HAM community does both.
said by ctceo :
So we know at least that they are not receiving significant interference or don't have a problem with what is being generated. So it seems that the only complaints come from those scanning for such iunterference... What this tells me is that based on the complaints of HAM operators utilising their right to voice a complaint with the FCC is the major hurdle here.
YOU may say there is no interference but the data proves otherwise. For you to debate this issue, you need to provide supporting data which you have refused to provide.
said by ctceo :
Now we wait for the FCC to ring in on official standards once testing is complete, and spectrum re-allocation occurs (if it will be necessary)
Spectrum allocation? Care to explain? You think the FCC is going to tell all the HAMs to leave the HF spectrum? You do understand that this will violate international treaties concerning the HF spectrum.
For a guy who is so against the government, you sure seem to want the FCC to protect you. |
