Re: Small city - dslreports.com

Forums » City-Wide WiFi » Small city


Share Topic:	RSS topic:	toggle: flat / full normal / watch	Post a:	Post a:

« They Make a Good Case for Being First Wi-Fi City

Nerdtalker Working Hard, Or Hardly Working? Premium,MVM join:2003-02-18 Tucson, AZ clubs:	Re: Small city said by CPM : Grand haven is so small, one wi-fi router would cover it And it probably does I agree, probably a cheap router and a simple omnidirectional antenna. LOL!!! -- Touch a thistle timidly, and it pricks you; grasp it boldly, and its spines crumble. -William S. Halsey
	permalink · 2004-07-29 14:32:45 · Print ·

hottboiinnc ME join:2003-10-15 Cleveland, OH	Re: Small city Theres a few cities around Ohio that are that big that are considered Cities now. But all you need is to put the antenna on a water tower the city owns and you got it set :p
	permalink · 2004-07-29 14:38:02 ·

DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX

said by Nerdtalker :
I agree, probably a cheap router and a simple omnidirectional antenna.

While it is technically possible to use one of those cheap AP, only a limited number of users will be admitted. Typically cheap APs from Linksys, D-Link etc. can only accomodate 32 or so users at the same time. That is why enterprise/wisp grade access points are more expensive while seemingly offering the exact same service.

permalink · 2004-07-29 15:42:25 · Print ·

hottboiinnc ME join:2003-10-15 Cleveland, OH	Re: Small city True. They could have had some different software in the product. The DLink enterprise routers only allow 52 on it at a time i think. Its hard telling what they use actually without going and finding out.
	permalink · 2004-08-01 22:09:16 ·

your comment..

Forums » City-Wide WiFi

« They Make a Good Case for Being First Wi-Fi City


Friday, 27-Nov 18:39:00	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF