pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
 ·Comcast
| reply to wentlanc
Re: Should have done it from the start...
said by wentlanc  :
They should have locked it down sufficiently from the start.
Microsoft did just that with Windows Server 2003. You have to explicitly enable each Internet-related service. The only thing I don't like is that you still need to reboot the OS after doing certain patches. That kind of downtime is unacceptable in a production environment. Oh well, serves you right for going with such an OS.
--
9/11 was the best thing to happen to Michael Moore
Win another one for the Gipper! Bush/Cheney 2004 |
|
richk_1957
If ..Then..Else
Premium
join:2001-04-11
Minas Tirith
| I've checked out a lot of the things available for 2003 Server and for a lot of things you don't need a reboot, just the major changes.
I remember with 9.x & NT if you even looked at the stupid thing the wrong way, it would ask for a reboot.
Never tried WinME
W2K was much better
And if you do something in XP that requires a reboot, chances 2003 server will require it also. In every one of the MS classes I've taken I've been told that XP-Pro is the workstation version of 2003 server |
|
wentlanc
You Can't Fix Dumb..
join:2003-07-30
Maineville, OH | reply to pnh102
What about Win2k, which will be supported until 2005??
puritan |
|
Pz_
join:2001-03-31
Brownsburg, IN
clubs: | reply to richk_1957
You aren't even kidding. I remember with 9x that if you even opened the network folder...and then left (without doing anything) it asked you to reboot.
lol |
|
