B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
| reply to Samwoo
Re: 50% Failure?
Bayesian filters would catch that kind of junk at over 99%, as long as they had any ham at all.
But you make a very good point; I don't know what he's getting 'stuffed' with, and didn't really read that carefully.
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function |
|
Samwoo
join:2002-02-15
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA | reply to B
wait what does he consider spam?
if i send him 5 emails that contain gibberish i bet gmail won't filter it.
i mean if people are sending him gibberish and random emails i bet that gmail cant filter it... |
|
B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
| First, I'm impressed by how fast »gmail.prattboy.net/ loads, especially considering the publicity.
Second, what's with the 40-50% GMail spam filter accuracy rating?
Perhaps it's because he's purposely stuffing it with spam and little ham, but 50% is just abysmal performance for ANY spam filter...
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function |
|
