Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Secure Me, Please » tell me about it
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Ms patch fubar (win 2000 users read)  
AuthorAll Replies


jap
Premium
join:2003-08-10
038xx
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to Megladon13
Re: tell me about it

Megladon, I echo MrChris' response. All the MS errors I've seen were for one of two reasons: pre-existing system infection or corruption OR failed installation via windows update - not because the patches themselves were bad. That's not to say patch compatibility issues don't occur just that the vast majority of patch failures get blamed on the patch when in fact it was delivery method or a flaw in the system it was applied to. As a second-tier tech who managed 200 public & quasi-public systems I've responded to hundreds of patch failures.

Mostly the pros DO NOT use windows update: the offline version of the patch is downloaded to the local network and applied from there. Despite improvements to the windows update site it still is second-rate: unless you are on dial-up it's always better to use the offline packages. Before you do a rebuild (unless you are due for one anyway) you might wanna download the offlines, un-install the recent patches that destabilized your system, clean the system, then re-apply the patches from the offline source.

G'luck!

alexlck

join:2002-08-04
Chicago, IL

said by jap See Profile:
Megladon, I echo MrChris' response. All the MS errors I've seen were for one of two reasons: pre-existing system infection or corruption OR failed installation via windows update - not because the patches themselves were bad. That's not to say patch compatibility issues don't occur just that the vast majority of patch failures get blamed on the patch when in fact it was delivery method or a flaw in the system it was applied to. As a second-tier tech who managed 200 public & quasi-public systems I've responded to hundreds of patch failures.

Mostly the pros DO NOT use windows update: the offline version of the patch is downloaded to the local network and applied from there. Despite improvements to the windows update site it still is second-rate: unless you are on dial-up it's always better to use the offline packages. Before you do a rebuild (unless you are due for one anyway) you might wanna download the offlines, un-install the recent patches that destabilized your system, clean the system, then re-apply the patches from the offline source.

G'luck!

order a FREE security fix CD from MS.


jap
Premium
join:2003-08-10
038xx
Easier for me to download, but whatever works!
Forums » Secure Me, Please« Ms patch fubar (win 2000 users read)  


Monday, 09-Nov 07:16:33 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [109] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [81] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Divorce advice... [General Questions]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [WIN7] Which Services in Win 7 Have You Turned Off? [Microsoft Help]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Messenger] wlcomm.exe and msnmsgr.exe [Microsoft Help]
· Anti Virus Program? Tried Avast-Looking For Better Program [Security]
· Security Software Updates - 09 Nov 2009 [Security]