republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
226
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·MS Apps FAQ ·Windows XP FAQ ·Windows 7 FAQ ·Windows Home ·Office Home
AuthorAll Replies


Gundam_MX
Stomping Robot

join:2003-06-27

[XP] Win XP Pro slow to defrag FAT32?

I have a dual boot Win 98 SE/Win XP Pro system.

When I run Diskeeper 8 Pro in Win XP Pro to defrag a FAT 32 system, it takes 10 minutes just to analyze the drive and forever to defrag it.

When I run Diskeeper 8 Pro in Win 98 SE it takes 30 seconds to analyze the drive and 10 seconds to defrag it.

Does anybody else find that defragging FAT32 drives is slow under Win XP Pro?

anthrorules
Premium
join:2003-09-14
Rollinsville, CO

I've not seen this problem. Although the only FAT32 drive I've defragged is my External HDD, don't know if that makes a difference or not. Also, my External HDD basically contains data files, no software installed (other than the standard Iomega stuff that came with the drive).
--
Earthlink/Direcway SRS - DW4000 | ver. 4.2.1.10 | Proxy/Port 83 | G4R | 970 | Dell Dimension 4550 - WinXP Pro SP1 - 768MB Ram |ZA+ 4.5 | AVG 7.0 - Resident | Bit Defender 7.1 Free - On-Demand |TDS-3 | Ad-Aware | SpyBot S&D | MailWasher Pro



TAPEUUP
Hell, Do A New Install

join:2003-03-04
Birmingham, AL

reply to Gundam_MX
Just curious, why do U use Fat32 for XP?


Ascot878

join:2002-02-18
England

He does it to maintain `communication` between both OS`s.
A FAT32 partition cannot read a NTFS partition - hence he has chosen to install XP as a FAT32 partition.
--
Regards, Paul Smith - pauls109@gotadsl.co.uk


Wednesday, 23-May 05:44:09 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics