<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Dirty in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r9696208</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:16:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:16:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Dirty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9696208</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/825088"><b>ObdH</b></A> : $50+ is too much imo, if you're getting bullcrap 1.5-2mb down and 128k up thats FUKCIN rediculous, im paying 39 for 3/256 cable and as soon as it increases to $50+ im outta here, substandard service and crappy connections make dsl worth the extra few $$ IMO<br><SMALL>--<br>STFU T00L</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9696208</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:57:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dirty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9696129</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/521023"><b>Lurch77</b></A> : Wife handles the bills, so I did not see this one. Maybe it is time to switch. $52+ is getting be too much. But then again, there are not many choices for someone that does not want to get cable. :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9696129</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:47:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
