Re: 5 IPs? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r9588073 en Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:43:18 EDT Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:43:18 EDT Re: 5 IPs? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9595937 AmeritecTech :
said by Wills See Profile:
Please explain to me why 5 IP's were allowed to reach 45,000 complaints.

One would think that 3 or 4 would be enough...

I'm glad they are disconnecting them.

Could be one batch of spam. They send millions at a time.
--
Independent thinkers tend to ALWAYS have someone not agreeing with them. It's the non-thinkers that always come in legions." -John Callari]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9595937 Sat, 06 Mar 2004 01:41:44 EDT Re: 5 IPs? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9589442 Bucknet : I don’t feel it’s the ISP’s reasonability to provide firewalls or antiviral programs. Both are readily available to anyone who wishes to choose those options. Even with firewalls and antiviral in place I see infected machines everyday in the job I do. Just as people don’t update their antiviral programs they also don’t update their operating system, sometimes this is far worse. As ISP’s become more vigilant in protecting their mail server’s spammers have taken to infecting home PC’s more and more. We have some of the fastest speeds in Canada and in the last year have seen a large increase in infected sets running proxy relays. When we spot an infected pc and the user doesn’t answer our contact attemps, the modem is put in quarantine until the user calls in and is advise of the condition their pc is in. For the most part the user is totally unaware of the problem. We will provide them with a number of web sites and informational sites so that they can clean their PC’s but in the end it’s the users responsibility to clean there PC. It should be the responsibility of the ISP to try and keep their footprint as clean as possible so that their user community isn’t impacted by compromised machines residing on that footprint. This is an uphill battle that never ends. We use a 3 strike rule, if a machine appears in the data base 3 times in a certain amount of time the modem Mac is sent to the security dept. and chances of that modem ever being enabled under that customers are reduce greatly. I think we are one of the few isps that are proactive in this area. It’s in the user agreement of most ISP’s if they choose to exercise the option,.Generally we have found our user base to be positive to this approach knowing that at least someone is trying to quell this scourge.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9589442 Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:15:23 EDT Re: 5 IPs? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9588073 GNXPower : 'Cause Comcast abuse is a complete joke. The only parts of Comcast that work are those that hose their customers with rate increases.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9588073 Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:37:42 EDT Re: 5 IPs? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9587981 N3OGH : I agree..

Half the spam I get is from Comcast.net addresses. I am a Comcast customer, and I'm sure that has something to do with it. Half the mail I get is spam.

The bottom line is, if you won't secure your machine, expect to have your connection cut. If you claim you've secured your machine, and it still pumps out spam, well then, hire a pro and get it right.

If my machine was a spam zombie, I would hope they would give me the chance to fix it, but if I kept spewing out the spam, I would expect to be cut off.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9587981 Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:26:02 EDT 5 IPs? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9587604 Wills : Please explain to me why 5 IP's were allowed to reach 45,000 complaints.

One would think that 3 or 4 would be enough...

I'm glad they are disconnecting them.
--
Abit VP-6 twin 800EB's @ 1002 Mhz. Proud member of the XDC. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9587604 Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:40:10 EDT