<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Sweet. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r9412562</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:06:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:06:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Sweet.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9412562</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/570051"><b>novaflare</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  ccseifert <A HREF="/useremail/u/418246"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Is there anything more ironic than a firewall with a system-takeover vulnerability?<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Lol there have been atacks to crash za around for a long long time. Dont effect me though first layer of defense smoothwall secound sygatepersonal pro 3 lic one for each comp on the lan along with avg to stop any viruses then 3rd layer common sense i think its the strongest layer of security i have and i recomend a very strong dose of it if your going to be online :p<br><SMALL>--<br>my fav mmorpg &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.rubiesofeventide.com" >www.rubiesofeventide.com</A> my site &raquo;<A HREF="http://spellbound.valshea.com/news.php" >spellbound.valshea.com/news.php</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9412562</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:20:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sweet.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9407204</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/411838"><b>PGDUDE</b></A> : Solution: Run both a hardware and software firewall.  I run both a a netgear firewall and the latest ZA 4.5.538.  That is plenty of protection for most home users.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9407204</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:29:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: sweet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9407179</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/461572"><b>MarkAW</b></A> : ISS advisory about Checkpoint termed 'inacurate'<br><br>"An advisory about vulnerabilities in the popular Checkpoint firewall, put out by Internet Security Systems last week, was inaccurate, a senior Checkpoint official says. <br><br>Scott Ferguson, Checkpoint regional director for Australia, New Zealand and the South Pacific, said the advice provided by ISS in its advisory was "not entirely accurate." <br><br>"One alleged flaw referred to a key exchange over private networks - this is referring to a three-year-old issue and the installed base has been upgraded a long time ago," Ferguson said." &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/13/1076548197498.html" >www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/&middot;&middot;&middot;498.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9407179</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:26:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sweet.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9406410</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/418246"><b>ccseifert</b></A> : Is there anything more ironic than a firewall with a system-takeover vulnerability?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9406410</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:53:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
