<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: its a good idea in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r9345285</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:01:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:01:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: its a good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9345288</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/720783"><b>SuperJudge</b></A> : They should be treated just like a virus producer, for attempting to corrupt the internet, in addition to trying to make money off of it. :mad:<br><SMALL>--<br>Updated My Journal</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9345288</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:22:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: its a good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9345285</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/156437"><b>dave</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  damascene <A HREF="/useremail/u/172020"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>its a good idea. similar to googles thing. target ppl<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Please explain how every other protocol will benefit from misdirecting a name lookup so that the application talks to a web server.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9345285</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:22:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: its a good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9344343</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/949465"><b>filmtvdp</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  damascene <A HREF="/useremail/u/172020"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>its a good idea. similar to googles thing. target ppl<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Yes, it is a good idea, but ONLY as a profit making hijack scheme for VeriSign.<br><br>First, unless you are already "locked" onto a site, very few of us ever get a 404 error. Most times, the re-direct will go to a search engine the OS has tucked away in the registry by one of the vendors who have an interest in having you use their search tool.<br><br>The difference in the way that VeriSign was doing it, was they would hijack your Web stats, making your visitor logs virtually useless.<br><br>I tried several times to contact them about this "problem", but never received a reply to my emails or phone calls. I finally had my attorney contact them, and their response to him was that in the future, they would have a commercial "add-on" that I could subscribe to (not free), that would give me my accurate originating site visitor stats.<br><br>So why would I want to pay for something I get for free now? Even when a person Googles my Web sites, I get the pass through stats, with VeriSign, all I saw was the VeriSign hijack. This is why a lot of ISPs and Web hosts were complaining.<br><br>They have much more of an agenda than just collecting ad revenue off of the redirect page.<br><br>Absolute power corrupts and absolute power always corrupts absolutely.<br><br>My two 'pence.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9344343</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:23:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>its a good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9343906</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/172020"><b>damascene</b></A> : its a good idea. similar to googles thing. target ppl]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9343906</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:20:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
