<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r9123494</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:02:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:02:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9170080</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/768632"><b>fixrman</b></A> : AdAware is updateable as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9170080</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:01:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9165669</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/919894"><b>speedy21</b></A> : Actually, I use Ad Aware Pro, Spybot, & Spy Sweeper. I run Ad Aware first, spybot second, & then Spysweeper. One program catches what the other program doesn't catch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9165669</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:20:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Support is the real issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9162577</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/937414"><b>SoCal99</b></A> : I appear to be like a lot people and I use Ad-aware, Spy-bot and Spyware Blaster, with Popup Cop and all 3 of my computers have ZERO pops or other nasty-ware.<br><br>But I agree with lilhurricane... What is more important is which product do you support financially!  Because some of the best programs like Spybot and Spyware Blaster are worth their weight in gold.  <br><br>I supported both products because they changed the way I  surf internet (being that 90% of all internet ads are from your own hard drive).  And Popup cop and Ad-aware keep new ones from coming.<br><br>And both Spybot and Spyware Blaster offer free updates to keep them current.  I am not affiliated with either company but I know that it takes time and resources to keep them both bug free and current.<br><br>So supporting these companies helps so they can afford to keep beating those sneaky, never-sleeping, bad guys.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9162577</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:34:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9148985</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : i use spybot 1.3 and adaware 6 and spy sweeper, as well as viruscan 8 which scans for spyware and virus and also use zonealarm 4.5 pro on my windows xp system this works good for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9148985</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:55:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9143328</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/262257"><b>crashnburn</b></A> : Why did Adaware only want you to pay and not the rest of us?  Been using it free all this time!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9143328</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 02:02:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9142865</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/934401"><b>histeve</b></A> : Adware has change since they first started. I know I was one of the first, Now they want me to pay more money under some knew speculating capitalist! Try some other spy removal. Boycott Adware.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9142865</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:36:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9132121</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/139520"><b>cork1958</b></A> : Ditto for me. Plus Spywareblaster for preventive measures.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9132121</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9127956</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/850558"><b>Rejected One</b></A> : ad-aware is good but the only draw back i found was that on certain adware it didnt remove all the spyware witch removed access from the internet. i backup what i removed and reinstalled it and i was back up. found spybot and ran it worked like a charm. spybot isn't perfect by all means but no program is but spy bot is damn close. i run both on my comp still adware 6 plus and spybot 1.3 beta 4 ( witch kicks ass ) <br><SMALL>--<br>Assumptions Are The Mother Of All F*&% Ups :P <BR> <BR>down with RIAA<BR> <BR><A HREF="http://home.comcast.net/~Boo-Bear-23">The Rejected Few˛</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9127956</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:38:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9127548</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/205310"><b>Piobaireachd</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  tdkyo <A HREF="/useremail/u/733065"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Heck, both of them do a good job. What I do is run ad-aware first then spybot to double check.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>I run them both as well.  <br><SMALL>--<br>"Re-elect Bush/Cheney, November 2004." - obodhisattva</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9127548</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:00:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9127080</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755198"><b>Jaysin21NC</b></A> : Hey every1<br>I use AdAwarePro and Spybot in combo... it works great and usually find things each lack... they are a good team.<br><SMALL>--<br>/usr/jaysin/.JBellSouth FastAccess DSL1250k/218k</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9127080</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:20:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9126217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/789123"><b>edbo245</b></A> : I use both Adaware and Spybot. They are both pretty good but Spybot just better since you have the ability to block things from ever getting on you pc. Plus Spybot seems to find more stuff anyway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9126217</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:56:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9126109</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/262257"><b>crashnburn</b></A> : spybot alone is suck.  I had experienced first hand with a number of systems at work.  I ran spybot first and it does it it supposed to do.  However, there are a fw that it failed to detect and remove so I ran adaware as well and it completely remove every spyware on the system.  Bottom line, spybot is good but not good enough.  Run both to be safe.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9126109</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:47:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9125800</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/665836"><b>Omega</b></A> : I also use ad-aware, it works fine.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9125800</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:20:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9125613</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/562454"><b>Bill Clo</b></A> : I second that. I use AdAware first, and then SpybotKiller. Spybotkiller frequently finds stuff that Adaware didn't.<br><br>It even found some Gator related stuff that Adaware didn't, which is strange because Adaware usually does a good job of rooting out Gator...<br><br>Just installed the SpywareBlaster. Thanks guys, for the ideas.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9125613</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:04:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9125214</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/816652"><b>LaurieDB</b></A> : I agree about using both.  I use both and I never have any problems.  I also am using SpywareBlaster.  In the past 2 years, the only spyware with which I've had to contend was the lop.com hijacker, but Ad-Aware killed it.  I'm very careful now to update definitions at least weekly now on all three products.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9125214</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:24:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9125038</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/261193"><b>jsouth</b></A> : I think it was Maximum PC that said that Spybot removed a few more "spyware" apps than adaware. Notice a said a few and not "a heck of a lot more" like the previous poster. I believe this is due to spybot having more updates put out than adaware. That said I use both.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9125038</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:05:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124867</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/728883"><b>Sid</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  jdir <A HREF="/useremail/u/382990"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Where I can I download Spbot?<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Download it here: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.safer-networking.org/" >www.safer-networking.org/</A><br><SMALL>--<br>WinXP,Kaspersky AV,Tauscan 1.6,Outpost Pro,IE  & Opera,Becky! 2.07</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124867</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:47:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124848</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/382990"><b>jdir</b></A> : Where I can I download Spbot?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124848</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:44:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124646</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/635815"><b>ghostpainter</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  lilhurricane <A HREF="/useremail/u/751678"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  NightLinks <A HREF="/useremail/u/403673"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I use SPYBOT & ADWARE they both work good for me.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Same here...both.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>I use adaware, but I also have a NAT firewall and sygate, running on all PC's, and then I use DSL broadband security checks and pcaudit to make sure I am suecure...With this setup I have reduced my miner and data tracks hits to maybe 20 a week and registry hits to zero (fingers crossed) Then Norton watches for virus's....I feel secure but am I???]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124646</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:22:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124531</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/810471"><b>Nanoprobe</b></A> : Same here,spybot& adaware with spywareguard also to help prevent that crap from installing in the first place.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124531</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:09:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124038</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/155037"><b>Hall</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Cod <A HREF="/useremail/u/169835"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>...spybot finds a heck of alot more spyware on a PC the the latter. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I'm curious how you tested this... If you ran SpyBot first and cleaned spyware out, that doesn't leave Ad-aware much to find. Say you've got 50 items of spyware and SpyBot finds 45 of them. Clean them out and then run Ad-aware. It finds the remaining 5. That doesn't mean SpyBot is better.<br><br>I run both actually. I don't care or think one's better than the other. I know Ad-aware doesn't consider c-dilla spyware, but Spybot does. At the same time, there's probably items that Ad-aware considers spyware that SpyBot doesn't... They're both small, unobtrusive, and free, so like I said, I use them both.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124038</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:07:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124014</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/403673"><b>NightLinks</b></A> : you really should use both SPYBOT & ADWARE <br><br>theirs spyware that ADWARE doesn't catch and spybot does and vice versa.<br><br>just like TDKYO said I use ADWARE first then I use SPYBOT<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.s5000.net/">Fujifilm Finepix S5000 Portal</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9124014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:05:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123970</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/219234"><b>vice8686</b></A> : Ditto:)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123970</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:59:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123949</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Actually, Ad-Aware can now download updates as well.<br><br>I do have to agree, though.  Spybot seems to catch more spyware, although I run both, just to be sure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123949</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:57:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spybot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123848</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/605287"><b>verolom</b></A> : I concur!  The only effective way to fight the bastards is with money (as unfortunate as that is).  It's too bad that PayPal doesn't exactly have a clean reputation when it comes down to protecting your privacy and your credit card info.  Fortunately we can mail a cash donation:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.safer-networking.org/index.php?page=donate-alternative" >www.safer-networking.org/index.p&middot;&middot;&middot;ernative</A><br><br>Oh yeah, Spybot - Search & Destroy rulez!<br><br>Actually, come to think of it, most German software rulez!  (Ahead Nero, O&O Defrag, OpenOffice, WinRAR (that's Russian, but now is based in Germany, etc.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123848</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:41:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spybot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123682</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : More importantly than which one you like, please donate to the one that you like.  It gives the authors incentives to keep the applications supported.<br><br>I like spybot and have donated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123682</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:16:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123517</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/733065"><b>tdkyo</b></A> : Heck, both of them do a good job. What I do is run ad-aware first then spybot to double check.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123517</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:50:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123513</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/751678"><b>lilhurricane</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  NightLinks <A HREF="/useremail/u/403673"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I use SPYBOT & ADWARE they both work good for me.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Same here...both.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123513</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:50:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123494</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/403673"><b>NightLinks</b></A> : I use SPYBOT & ADWARE they both work good for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123494</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:45:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123416</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/169835"><b>Cod</b></A> : Not to make this a spybot vs. ad-aware dispute, spybot finds a heck of alot more spyware on a PC the the latter.  Plus its ability to download updates to detect new spyware makes it incredibly accurate.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123416</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:32:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123401</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/647649"><b>Doubledee32</b></A> : SpySweeper works great!! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123401</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:28:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123387</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/462602"><b>CO_Chris</b></A> : I  Use Ad-aware and it works great . If there is better i would try it to]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123387</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:25:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Spbot is fine for me.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123373</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/728883"><b>Sid</b></A> : I just use spybot. It works just fine for me. But I do know that a lot of people use both spybot and adaware. But I am going to download spywareblaster. Just havent got around to it. They are free! <br>Oh yeah, I almost forgot......First post! wooohoooo :) <SMALL>-- WinXP,Kaspersky AV,Tauscan 1.6,Outpost Pro,IE & Opera,Becky! 2.07</SMALL> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9123373</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:22:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
