<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Scare Tactics and Marketing Ploys in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r9078093</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:53:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:53:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Scare Tactics and Marketing Ploys</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9078093</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/859949"><b>TheChosenOne2</b></A> : Um... blocking OUTBOUND port 80? Wouldn't that basically render the NAT box useless for most people who don't know what they're doing? CyberGuard is just trying to sell more of their own firewalls. It's nothing but a scare tactic and a marketing ploy all rolled into one.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9078093</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:15:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
