<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: NIce in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r9064126</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:23:34 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:23:34 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: NIce</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9064126</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/761749"><b>Vamp</b></A> : But think that it might be available for those who cant get broadband, I suppose that would be a better option for people then satellite would be.<br><SMALL>--<br>Best game ever > &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.desertcombat.com" >www.desertcombat.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9064126</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:40:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>NIce</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9064106</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/552565"><b>vang</b></A> : Edit: dang, someone beat me<br><br>The price should be very attrictive, but the speeds are lacking to existing, entrenched technologies.  Still, a third player in the "utility" broadband is welcome.<br><br>Maybe this is the tier that gets people off of dialup...<br><SMALL>--<br>I'm a lean, mean, speed thingy!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9064106</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:37:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
