I don't care about it because I use a spam filter. in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8937966 en Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:22:02 EDT Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:22:02 EDT Re: I don't care about it because I use a spam fil http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8945058 reub2000 : Yeah, it unfair that anyone running a mail server has to pay for bandwidth and cpu time of receiving and filtering spam, but there is no solution. It's the price we pay for a free and open method of communication.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8945058 Thu, 01 Jan 2004 01:43:37 EDT Re: I don't care about it because I use a spam filter. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8941539 JPCass :
said by reub2000 See Profile:
Instead of wining about the latest bill not doing anything about spam, why not use a spam filter. Thunderbird gets rid of most of my spam.


You're assuming everyone is an individual user with the knowledge, time and money to invest. That doesn't cover a lot of users, like my kids and my parents, nor does it cover personal and business domains that get slammed with "dictionary" spam sent to many addresses. Spam imposes huge costs of time and money on individuals and businesses - estimated recently at $20 billion - which is only going to grow unless some sort of correction is put into the system.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8941539 Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:52:48 EDT I don't care about it because I use a spam filter. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8937966 reub2000 : Instead of wining about the latest bill not doing anything about spam, why not use a spam filter. Thunderbird gets rid of most of my spam.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8937966 Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:38:45 EDT