<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Just another example of &#x22;Blame Shifting&#x22; in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8896228</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:25:54 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:25:54 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Just another example of &#x22;Blame Shifting&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8909474</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : It's not akin to leaving your door unlocked.  It's like leaving all your possessions in a 30 yard radius outside your house, in the street, on your yard (the range of your Wifi network).  While I might not be tempted to take your stuff, I probably would look at it before I left as I was in the street legally, on public property.<br><br>-So I accidentally leave my front door to my home unlocked -or my car door unlocked. Does that give everyone carte blanche to steal me blind?<br>I hope not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8909474</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:39:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just another example of &#x22;Blame Shifting&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8896621</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/605287"><b>verolom</b></A> : Damn right!  If someone walks into your home and commits a crime how the hell can you be held liable?  After all you did secure your home, you closed the door.  So what is secure in the first place?   A lock on the door, a deadbolt, a steel door, steel bars, an alarm system, CCTV, gated neighbourhood, barb wire, guards, machine guns, mine fields, tanks, an army?<br><br>How many billions of dollars does the US spend on defense each year?  Are we still secure?  Should we sue ourselves for letting the terrorists kill our own people?<br><br>Am I getting crazy here, or it is not just me?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8896621</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:39:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just another example of &#x22;Blame Shifting&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8896228</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/264881"><b>technick</b></A> : You point out a very good point of view, and I agree 110% with your point of view. You can not be held responsible for <B>anyone else's</B> actions. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8896228</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:40:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Just another example of &#x22;Blame Shifting&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8892899</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/154771"><b>schja01</b></A> : So I accidentally leave my front door to my home unlocked or my car door unlocked. Does that give everyone carte blanche to steal me blind?<br>I hope not.<br>J<br><SMALL>--<br>As the number of components in a system approach <B>infinity</B> the Mean-Time-Before-Failure approaches <B>zero</B>.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8892899</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2003 09:57:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
