<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>hot-spot providers take heed!! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8611554</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:46:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:46:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: hot-spot providers take heed!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8614218</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/681589"><b>lazarus_</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  kba4 <A HREF="/useremail/u/502106"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>we will not let you provide free/cheap access to just the 'special' individuals you know about!  you have been warned!!<br><br>seriously, can anyone honesty have expected wi-fi to ever be secure?  how can you make a broadcast 'secret' anyway?  it's just an arms race between the 'hackers' and the providers/developers... i hope anyone investing in the hot-spot idea knows this going in, and will continue to fund what could someday become a utopia of free access anywhere in the country- even world.  i don't care how much you encrypt the data, if it's broadcast, it can be seen by anyone, and the 'hacker' actually prefers not to be paid for his work, unlike the 9-5 sysadmin wo 'secures the network'.  oh well, someone with more sense, please add to the discussion, i just saw the story and felt like posting:)<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Like my networking prof always says: "Anyone with a wet finger or metal clothing hanger can pickup your signal.."<br><br>Using WiFi you have the portability and easy of install but have to give up security.. If you have important info going over the network you should never use WiFi.. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8614218</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:17:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>hot-spot providers take heed!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8611554</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/502106"><b>kba4</b></A> : we will not let you provide free/cheap access to just the 'special' individuals you know about!  you have been warned!!<br><br>seriously, can anyone honesty have expected wi-fi to ever be secure?  how can you make a broadcast 'secret' anyway?  it's just an arms race between the 'hackers' and the providers/developers... i hope anyone investing in the hot-spot idea knows this going in, and will continue to fund what could someday become a utopia of free access anywhere in the country- even world.  i don't care how much you encrypt the data, if it's broadcast, it can be seen by anyone, and the 'hacker' actually prefers not to be paid for his work, unlike the 9-5 sysadmin wo 'secures the network'.  oh well, someone with more sense, please add to the discussion, i just saw the story and felt like posting:)<br><SMALL>--<br>the USA is a weapon of mass destruction.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8611554</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:53:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
