<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Slam them regardless.hehe in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8245510</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:11:36 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:11:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Slam them regardless.hehe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8245510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/739294"><b>onliners450</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR> if they release a more sophisticated firewall application they'll be slammed for invading the turf of firewall vendors, <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>So?They can afford to get slammed.They can afford anything.This is a good move IMO.Hell had there been such a firewall included I would not have renewed my ZA updates.<br><small>--<br>And now for something completely ridiculous, but true.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8245510</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:36:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
