<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>fiber to the pole/premesis in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8096633</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:34:47 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:34:47 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8100712</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  EvilByDesire <A HREF="/useremail/u/683214"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> ya thats true, a 622 Mbps upstream will send a whole dvd in like 10 minutes. And a 1.2 Gbps downstream can receive one in about 2 mins..God i want this connection<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Actually assuming you got scsi 320mbit equipment your speed would be one quarter of that 1.2gbps and one half of that 622mbps. once you start getting over 100mbps its your hardware that limits you, not your connection. and if you got ide crap then its even worse :/<br><small>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8100712</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:41:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8098783</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/589047"><b>bobbinbob</b></A> : As quoted from the article:<br><br>*****<br><br> "Bascom is investing in their network because they know the region and the needs of their population better than anyone else. By overbuilding with FiberPath 500 they can deliver what their subscribers are looking for - multi-line phone service, high quality video choices and services, and scalable high speed data in a single, integrated monthly bill."<br><br>*****<br><br>Yes, they are thinking of video services.  If they are forward looking enough to put in the FiberPath 500, then they are surely forward thinking enough to know about the need for HDTV services.<br><br>  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8098783</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:22:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8098630</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><b>BosstonesOwn</b></A> : My understanding is this is for broadband deployment.. read a bit more into it i doubt it will be for hdtv signals.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8098630</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:05:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8098346</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/589047"><b>bobbinbob</b></A> : It's highly unlikely that they will be offering their customers 1.2gb x 622mb data connections.  The cost of the backhaul to the Internet backbone would be enormous.  Most places on the Internet can't send you information that fast anyway.<br><br>On the FiberPath 500, the 1.2gb x 622mb is shared among 32 households per fiber run.  That bandwidth must carry voice, data and video to all the attached customers.  If you consider 3 tv's per house and each one watching an HDTV signal(in the future), then that bandwidth goes away real quickly.<br><br>That said, the FiberPath 500 is the most advanced product on the market right now and should provide plenty of bandwidth for many years to come.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8098346</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:34:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8097794</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/830595"><b>CanOpener4</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  detth <A HREF="/useremail/u/214966"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>these speeds are awesome, but I doubt it will cost the same as your current cable modem bill :) <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Exactly! How much will this cost?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8097794</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:22:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8097264</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214966"><b>detth</b></A> : these speeds are awesome, but I doubt it will cost the same as your current cable modem bill :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8097264</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:15:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096986</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/683214"><b>EvilByDesire</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Dest <A HREF="/useremail/u/146738"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>mp3s? with that kind of bandwidth they would have no problem trading DVDs! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>ya thats true, a 622 Mbps upstream will send a whole dvd in like 10 minutes. And a 1.2 Gbps downstream can receive one in about 2 mins..God i want this connection<br><small>--<br>Host: Xp Pro, 400Mhz, 512Mb Ram: 4.0.3.9(SP-C). ICS, Clients: 1.8 gHz p4, 1Gig Ram, Xp Pro | Mandrake 9| Xp Home Laptop| Proxy On| FapMon| Sat Speed|</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096986</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:44:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096951</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/146738"><b>Dest</b></A> : mp3s? with that kind of bandwidth they would have no problem trading DVDs!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096951</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:39:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096910</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/683214"><b>EvilByDesire</b></A> : just imagine it now...<br><br>Whole Ohio County Busted For Illegaly Tradeing mp3s on the net!.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096910</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:34:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096752</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/849152"><b>NotWulfen</b></A> : there's no need to run dsl over it, the fiber terminating equipment could have a nice cat5 jack built into it giving you 100mbps full duplex with the head end, a lot faster than DSL could give you =P]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096752</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:17:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>fiber to the pole/premesis</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096633</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/791866"><b>vulpine</b></A> : now if i'm not mistaken dsl cant go through fiber lines , so that would eliminate dsl in the areas with fiber to the pole now wouldnt it?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8096633</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:02:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
