Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS in Texas Gulf Coast http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8051721 en Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:41:13 EDT Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:41:13 EDT Re: Phonoscope's Speeds Blow away Time Warner! http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8856752 removed : Of course it's not clogged now, but it will be as the Kazaa and WinMX whores move in. Say, where do you live again...? ;)
--
ircd.removed.us - #dslr | oWn3d@removed.us]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8856752 Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:28:14 EDT Re: Phonoscope's Speeds Blow away Time Warner! http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8856740 coolcat713 : Strange, I've never had a problem with Phonoscope's Service or Speed Performance. Heres another typical speed test just done tonite.
Click for full size
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8856740 Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:26:59 EDT Re: Happy w/ Cable http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8830992 mr sean :
said by JerryC23 See Profile:
Well, we are in the process of getting moved** (only 6 blocks - but about 1 1/2 mile in the car
Be it ever so home, there's no place like Humble.
;-)
--
The Truth Behind The New Medicare]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8830992 Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:45:17 EDT Re: Happy w/ Cable http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8829762 removed :
said by JerryC23 See Profile:
Our latency has dropped from 113 with SFC to 40 or50 w/ cable. AND instead of 1300 -1400 downloads, we are getting around 3100. (With Tweaking yet to be done)


Don't worry... ;) DSL is due for another comeback.
--
ircd.removed.us - #dslr | oWn3d@removed.us]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8829762 Thu, 18 Dec 2003 23:05:49 EDT Happy w/ Cable http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8829507 JerryC23 :
said by removed See Profile:
..if only they could improve support, latency, and routing.... *pets his DSL router*

Well, we are in the process of getting moved** (only 6 blocks - but about 1 1/2 mile in the car)
and have switched
from SprintFastConnect (dsl)
to Mindspring via Time Warner (cable).

Our latency has dropped from 113 with SFC to 40 or50 w/ cable. AND instead of 1300 -1400 downloads, we are getting around 3100. (With Tweaking yet to be done)

On the hole, I'm really appreciating the "broader broadband" of cable. (yeah, yeah, I know I still need to update my ISP review)
===
** We started moving in November and expect to complete it sometime in January or February - Roam wasn't built in a day
:)
--
~Start a thread in The Texas Gulf Coast FORUM - Win a free beer ~~
~~ "Don't mis-underestimate me, too" :)~~

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8829507 Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:42:15 EDT Re: Phonoscope's Speeds Blow away Time Warner! http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8824360 removed : Maybe the ignorant door-to-door salespeople are getting to me. :(]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8824360 Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:09:11 EDT Re: Phonoscope's Speeds Blow away Time Warner! http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8823891 mr sean : oWn3d? Roadrunner?
Are you running a fever?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8823891 Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:16:28 EDT Re: Phonoscope's Speeds Blow away Time Warner! http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8812036 removed : Phonoscope sucks. You have no bandwidth management with them... that means one user can pretty much whore the hell out of the node.

I'd rather have *gasp* RoadRuner.
--
ircd.removed.us - #dslr | oWn3d@removed.us]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8812036 Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:47:12 EDT Re: Phonoscope's Speeds Blow away Time Warner! http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8802131 coolcat713 : Time Warner can't touch Phonoscope's Residential Cable Modem Speeds here in Houston! =P
Click for full size
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8802131 Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:47:10 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8067789 lilmoonee : also got the speed increase....at first i thought it was a mistake. this is great news :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8067789 Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:59:01 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8058607 Flippant : That is great news, and I am sure it is a welcome increase. I would be damn happy. Actually it looks like my DSL is going to get a bump in upload to finally match what you have. It is welcome to me. So a round of cheers for everyone, who doesn't like getting something for "nothing".

Not so sure why you feel it is necessary to pimp cable, it kind of cheapens the whole announcement, like spam. Interesting website BTW. But regardless of that happy days!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8058607 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:31:16 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8057106 removed : --- dslreports.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 43.5/44.1/44.7 ms
--
Before asking...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8057106 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:16:11 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8055426 ilikeme : COOL SPEEDS!!! pings don't seem as bad now.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping www.dslreports.com

Pinging dslreports.com [209.123.109.175] with 32 bytes of data

Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=48
Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=48
Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=48
Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 209.123.109.175:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 52ms, Maximum = 72ms, Average = 59ms
Click for full size
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8055426 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:36:26 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8054077 CO_Chris : HI Y'all.. i am on a cruise ship in Grand cayman and had to read my page.. missed it over the last 5 days.. will be home on sat night but DAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM TWC in Houston got there butt up.. Yahoooooooooooooo.. to bad i cant use it till sat/sun. .. well Bye From The RCCL ship Navigator of the Seas..
--
Super Bowl Bound The Houston TEXANS. Well we will have the Super Bowl here this year Anyway]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8054077 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:15:25 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8053218 mr sean : I'm in Midtown/Montrose.
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8053218 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:36:15 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8052070 pharcide : yea i'm now seeing almost everyone in and around houston with timewarner already @ 3megs down
--
I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... I'm all out of bubble gum!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8052070 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:20:49 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051721 Cam : WooHoo!!

I thought my downloads had been going faster over the last couple of days.

I'm in Houston, on the Southwest Side of town.
Click for full size
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051721 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:36:05 EDT Re: NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051268 removed : Sounds like fun. Now, if only they could improve support, latency, and routing....

*pets his DSL router*
--
Before asking...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051268 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:26:10 EDT NEW HOUSTON TIMEWARNER SPEEDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051223 pharcide : this has already launched for the humble area all timewarner customers meaning that you have broadband through: Roadrunner, Earthlink, AOL, or Stic.net are about to get 3megs down/384up thats 1 meg above the old 2meg/384up. This new speed is free and no extra charge just another reason to leave dsl and come to cable based service.

(just because you think your in the humble area you might not be considered to be by timewarner so don't be suprised if you dont' have the speed just yet)
--
I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... I'm all out of bubble gum!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051223 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:17:51 EDT