<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Question to dfw sbc users in AT&#x26;T Southwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8000593</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:02:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:02:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Question to dfw sbc users</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8008586</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/732594"><b>ronpin</b></A> : Not Keller/Southlake. My 1.5-6mbs Expert Plus pkg. is still <U><I>all over the map</I></U> on speed tests, after 3 weeks of service. Early-on I saw ~4mbs , but now it ranges from near 2mbs to 3mbs+ Uploads are ~500kbs though.<br><br>I think SBC's "adaptive rate" really means "Available Bit Rate" (ABR) which is an older ATM QoS term (maybe both terms apply). I have a hard time accepting an ABR that varies hourly more than 100%. I think I'm gonna put in a trouble ticket before my 1st 30 days are up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8008586</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:57:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Question to dfw sbc users</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8002109</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/543439"><b>raburch</b></A> : not here in the colony yet. I'm still at 1158/108.I doubt I'll see much of an increase though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8002109</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:39:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Question to dfw sbc users</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8002071</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/868917"><b>joekingboy</b></A> : I haven't seen anything either. Im still at 1.3/137. I think the standard plus package will be the second to last to get upgraded. I hope it doesn't matter that Im on an RT. Im being as patient as I can.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8002071</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:34:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Question to dfw sbc users</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8002034</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/832136"><b>techwench</b></A> : <br>Not me either.  1190/247 and holding steady (currently on 1.5/256 package).  But I thought I remember them saying something about October...so I'm not thinking much about it, really.  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8002034</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:31:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Question to dfw sbc users</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8001089</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/171092"><b>Zeb</b></A> : Not me.... At 1536/160. :&lt;]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8001089</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:25:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Question to dfw sbc users</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8000593</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/679667"><b>allmighty_ke</b></A> : has anyone seen the effects of the new speed packages? i myself have not although i dont know if my line can take it anyways.  just curious Thx.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8000593</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:24:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
