<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Just a repeater please in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r7649460</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:02:43 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:02:43 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Just a repeater please</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7652381</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  payurbills <A HREF="/useremail/u/565029"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Just use Bluetooth... This is exactly why bluetooth is far better then 802.11<br><br>E. Out <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Puuuuuuuuuuulease. bluetooth was dead years ago. max bandwidth (under optimal conditions) is about 1.1mbps. farther than 6 feet its about 500kbps. far too slow and short distance for networking. while it may be ok for cellphones or whatever.<br><small>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7652381</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:22:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just a repeater please</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7650612</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  alex4life <A HREF="/useremail/u/416676"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I thought Bluetooth was shorter range and lower bandwidth...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>That is true, but what the original poster does not understand is that WiFi and Bluetooth are <B>not</B> competing technologies.  They have different applications entirely.  WiFi is used strictly for networking machines like computers, handhelds, server, etc. and providing Internet connectivity to such machines.  Bluetooth on the other hand is suited for things like cordless keyboards, mice and such.<br><small>--<br>Jewel got Britney-fied!  There is hope for the world yet!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7650612</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:22:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just a repeater please</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7650444</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/416676"><b>alex4life</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  payurbills <A HREF="/useremail/u/565029"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Just use Bluetooth... This is exactly why bluetooth is far better then 802.11<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Why?  I thought Bluetooth was shorter range and lower bandwidth...<br><small>--<br>"For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet, we all breathe the same air, we all cherish our children's future, and we are all mortal." - John F. Kennedy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7650444</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:07:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just a repeater please</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7649460</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/299877"><b>Juke Box</b></A> : Actually Bluetooth is used and has many applications then most people know about.<br><br>But of course, you couldn't see that here at BBR/DSLR from an array of manufacturers and various industries that don't disclose their technology used.<br><br>Edit: For clarification..<br><SMALL>--<br>If your having half as much fun as we are, then we are having twice as much fun than you are.  Do the math <A HREF="http://rock.beonair.com"><B>Here</B>!</SMALL><br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-08-11 14:28:17]</i>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7649460</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:23:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just a repeater please</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7649324</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/552481"><b>Neophyte101</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Just use Bluetooth... This is exactly why bluetooth is far better then 802.11<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Unfortunately for you, everybody else around the world does not feel the same way which is why Bluetooth is on its way out. I thought it was a rather useless technology myself.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7649324</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:09:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just a repeater please</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7647619</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/565029"><b>payurbills</b></A> : Just use Bluetooth... This is exactly why bluetooth is far better then 802.11<br><br>E. Out]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7647619</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:33:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Just a repeater please</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7647216</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><b>Camelot One</b></A> : I would be happy with wireless cards that doubled as a repeater/AP, I can do without the rest. I think this would be a major boom for home wireless networks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7647216</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:26:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
