<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Doomed by incompetence from the beginning.... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r7435750</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:04:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:04:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Doomed by incompetence from the beginning....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7451693</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Can they deliver within 5 days - at any price? The agreement apparently specified that Verizon be able to connect customers in that time, which seems to require that they lay cables past every door.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7451693</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:13:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Doomed by incompetence from the beginning....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7435903</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/438254"><b>MortySnerd</b></A> : sigh....<br><br>Sadly if I was a judge I'd have to side with Verizon on this. You are absolutely correct, and PA doesn't have a leg to stand on with this.<br><br>How can you be so dumb as to not include a price when they wrote that agreement though? Heck, I will offer anyone on this board unlimited 1GB/1GB fiber anywhere in the world, provided you pay me correctly. Geez....<br><small>--<br>This light dinner is over.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7435903</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:57:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Doomed by incompetence from the beginning....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7435750</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/793283"><b>calvoiper</b></A> : It appears the deal probably never guaranteed anything--by not specifying a price for 45 Mb service, they PUC left itself open to the current situation--VZ can claim 45 Mb is "available" everywhere--but only at outrageous cost and rates.<br><br>This deal is typical of the "exchanges" that ILECs have participated in--the key element of which is they get what they want (rate increase, higher burden on competitors, etc.) right away and some ill-defined "community benefit" is to follow.  Any PUC that currently accepts such a deal is either ignorant or corrupt.  (Anyone from the Illinois or Oklahoma Commissions care to identify which they are?)<br><br>Sadly, this is reminiscent of the '90's when the electric utilities pushed "automated meter reading" as a way to "save money"--but the funny thing was, in order to save money, the utilities always wanted a rate increase or surcharge to pay for the new equipment!  Smart Commissions said that the utilities should pay out of the savings--Dumb Commissions granted the requests.<br><br>Calvoiper<br><small>--<br>VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7435750</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:41:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
