<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: huh? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r7184094</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:01:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:01:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7184094</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/667146"><b>aarong3</b></A> : nobody seems to be addressing this, and that worries me.<br>get your tech straight before you start mouthing off, people.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7184094</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2003 01:13:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7178923</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/427235"><b>wkendrvr</b></A> : Hello?  We are talking apples and oranges again.  Bluetooth is not the same type of protocol as 802.11 (think irDA). <br><br>They were NEVER intended to compete with each other, if anything, barring interference problems, they can enhance each other...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7178923</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:28:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
