<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Old News in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r6986188</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:18:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:18:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Old News</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7002682</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/136163"><b>avantare</b></A> : Kinda reminds me of the ones that say we needed to give Iraq more time...<br><br>Whadda ya mean more time?!?!?... 11 years not long enough!!!<br><br>(Let the flames begin. :P)<br><br>Chuck]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7002682</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 17:01:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Old News</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6994268</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : FYI dood:<br><br>This topic was front page news on DSL reports, so maybe talk to Jason about why it was there.<br><br>DUH!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6994268</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2003 16:27:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Old News</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6989191</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/433595"><b>ravital</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  mjcrocket <A HREF="/useremail/u/253980"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>This topic has been here before!  This very topic was introduced here on Jan 7 of this year!  This thread doesn't appear to offer any new information since back in January! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Well, one thing that's new and right off the bat -  in the headline as a matter of fact, is the request to the state AG for an investigation.  That was decided last night.  That's in addition to the ongoing lawsuit for breach of contract.  And Adelphia's suit against other towns for having the nerve not to commit to renewing their franchise (how can I get into a business where I can sue people for refusing to be my customers?)  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  mjcrocket <A HREF="/useremail/u/253980"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>It appears from the newspaper link provided that the idea of the Merrimack building its own system might be dead, <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Strange, I read the article at the link provided, Merrimack is not even mentioned there and no word about the "death" of such ideas.  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  mjcrocket <A HREF="/useremail/u/253980"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> If a new system is being turned on in a few days, hasn't construction of that new system been going on for the past few months?  Doesn't that mean that the people of Merrimack knew that there was a good possibility that "improved" service was just around the corner?  <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I have had the service since April 2001 when it was first offered, and I've been hearing about upgrades and promises of improvements since April 2001 when it was first offered.  They've had <B>twenty five months</B> for Yog's sake, why should I hold my breath this time?<br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  mjcrocket <A HREF="/useremail/u/253980"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Wither that improved service meets their expectations is another matter!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I know you meant "whether" and not "wither," but "wither" is quite appropriate as far as Adelphia in NH is concerned.  Wither they should.<br><small>--<br>Sutor, ne supra crepidam</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6989191</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 22:57:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Old News</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6986188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/253980"><b>mjcrocket</b></A> : This topic has been here before!  This very topic was introduced here on Jan 7 of this year!  This thread doesn't appear to offer any new information since back in January!  I have not seen anything indicating how the town meeting addressed this issue, if at all!  It appears from the newspaper link provided that the idea of the Merrimack building its own system might be dead, because the article includes a statement that it would take years to build a new system!  In fact digging around in the links on the newspaper WEB site, was a news article reporting that Adelphia was turning on its new system in the area beginning June 3. <br><br>  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=81289&SectionID=25&SubSectionID=354&S=1" >www.nashuatelegraph.com/main.asp&middot;&middot;&middot;=354&S=1</A><br><br>  I am just a bit confused as to just what the starter of this discussion had in mind!  If a new system is being turned on in a few days, hasn't construction of that new system been going on for the past few months?  Doesn't that mean that the people of Merrimack knew that there was a good possibility that "improved" service was just around the corner?  Wither that improved service meets their expectations is another matter!  Aren't Milford & Merrimack part of the same local Adelphia System?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6986188</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 16:51:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
