<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Updated 811493 Patch in Microsoft Help</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r6967593</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:53:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:53:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7064004</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/511014"><b>Unhygienix</b></A> : Well, thanks for all the responses folks. Exactly what I was looking for. Just here to report that the updated version of the patch, while much better than the original, causes a slowdown on my XP machine. <br><br>I agree with IncognitoOOL. This exploit does not pose any real risk to my personal machine. So I am living without the new patch for now.<br><br>Andrew<br><small>--<br>Go Leafs Go</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7064004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2003 12:07:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7060022</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/515505"><b>IncognitoOOL</b></A> : I just got rid of that patch. I noticed that my computer was running a lot slower than usual with the new patch. Microsoft says that the attacker needs to log onto the computer locally in order to carry out an attack. So unless your computer is in some location where many people can access it, then you should be ok. <br><small>--<br>"Exhilaration is that feeling you get just after a great idea hits you, and just before you realize what's wrong with it."Forum Posts:<A HREF="/tracker/515505">4178</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7060022</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2003 20:50:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7012150</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/774446"><b>Capt America5</b></A> : Just wanted to add my two cents on Q811493. Had been holding off installing this patch because of the last go around with it, so been watching for problems. After three days, decided to go ahead and install it. I ran XP with this patch for two days and the problems I experienced was a slight speed decrease in page loading and sometimes a real noticeable lag. Also, at times there was an incomplete page loading. I removed the patch and now my speed is back to normal, and the pages are loading normally/completely.<br><br>Has anyone noticed any irregularities that I have noticed? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7012150</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2003 19:13:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7005554</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/425706"><b>geierr</b></A> : Just installed this update as well as Q815021 today. No slowdowns to report here.:) Thanks to this forum, I stayed away from the original Q811493 patch because of the slowdowns and warned a friend of mine about this patch too.<br><small>--<br>Robert L. Geier</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7005554</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 23:04:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000871</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/232802"><b>Grimm</b></A> : I have Update Q815021 installed, and my system appears to be running as smoothly, and as fast as ever...  I also have the new 811493 installed..  Quite a difference from the original 811493!<br><br>Grimmy<br><small>--<br>Who..? ME?? Nahhhhh</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000871</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:51:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000850</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/172037"><b>MSeng</b></A> : Review the filelist and compare it to the information <A HREF="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811493"><B>here</B></A>.<br><small>--<br>Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark, professionals built the Titanic.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000850</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:48:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000847</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/515505"><b>IncognitoOOL</b></A> : I actually did a windows update today. So I checked the windows update history for my computer. The 811493 patch was installed today, so it must be the new version. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000847</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:48:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000835</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/515505"><b>IncognitoOOL</b></A> : Yeah, but those registry keys that they want you to check could be part of the old version too. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000835</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:45:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000825</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/172037"><b>MSeng</b></A> : Read the section on <B>Verifying patch installation</B> in the <A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-013.asp">Security Bulletin</A>.<br><small>--<br>Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark, professionals built the Titanic.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000825</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:43:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000804</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/515505"><b>IncognitoOOL</b></A> : How do I know if I have the old version or the new version of 811493?<br><br>Edit: This is what the patch info says in the control panel. Can a user who has updated to the new patch tell me what the info for the new patch says? This will help me determine if I have the new one or not. <br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-06-01 12:44:09]</i><br><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/7000804?c=360147&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3I2OTY3NTkzLnhtbA%3D%3D"><IMG TITLE="16082 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=334 HEIGHT=191 SRC="/r0/download/360147~a1b36373507fa671c84c0b0b9d810afb/ctrlp.JPG"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000804</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:41:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000564</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/332558"><b>Ryan</b></A> : I do knowtice one thing when i installed the patch it seems that the hardrive makes some noise when launching ie an delays about a half a sec - a sec where without the patch it loads instantly from the memory. It seems to do this when i disable the virus scan too which was the same problem with the last patch. However the slowdown is barely knowticeable.<br><small>--<br>POOoOoOPs@hotmail.com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000564</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:06:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000293</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/756449"><b>Keizer</b></A> : I second what JTM said.   Keizer]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7000293</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 11:28:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6999390</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/191317"><b>bcool</b></A> : Q815021 patch is made up of one (1) file, <I>ntdll.dll</I> 5.1.2600.1217 (SP2) - an update related specifically to <B>IIS</B>. <br><br>from what I gather, this patch does not apply to <I>Home</I> users unless you have manually added IIS which doesn't install with XP Home in its default setup.  So I'll pass on <B>Q815021</B>...<br><small>--<br>"in flagrante delicto"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6999390</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 08:18:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6998664</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/326716"><b>redxii</b></A> : No problems here. XP Home]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6998664</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 02:24:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6997402</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/170670"><b>JTM1051</b></A> : I installed both of the 811493 and 815021 updates this morning from Windows Update on my Win XP Pro SP1 system.<br><br>Been using system all day and as of yet, have had no ill effects as to speed or any applications including NAV 2002.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6997402</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2003 23:16:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6982746</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/195472"><b>Wxman</b></A> : This has been an interesting morning. My plan was to install both updates (811493 and 815021) individually. When I logged in the auto update globe was on the task bar and I decided just to use it to install the updates. <br><br>I installed 811493 and then reset the computer. When I logged back in my hard drive was missing. I uninstalled the update and reset my computer again and when it came back up my hard drive was still missing. I found that interesting. <br><br>I then decided to shut my computer and left it off for approximately 15-20 minutes. I then restarted my computer and logged back in, and the hard drive was there. I got to thinking that, maybe, I had to shut the computer off in order for the update to work properly on my PC. <br><br>I repeated the process, but this time I shut the computer off and let it set for about 15 minutes and then started it back up and logged back in. However, my hard drive was missing again. I uninstalled the patch again, and reset the computer, logged back in and the HD was there. <br><br>I then decided to take another approach to the update and went to the Microsoft update page and use that. I installed 811493 and reset the computer and guess what. The HD was there!!  I don't know why the auto update was messing me up, but it was. I then installed 815021 without any problem from the update site. <br><br>I have noticed that my reboots and log-ons are a little slower since the updates, but other than that no real differences apparent yet. <br><br>Fred  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6982746</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 09:29:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6982361</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/191317"><b>bcool</b></A> : oh by the way, I notice that Q815021 patch is made up of one (1) file, <I>ntdll.dll</I> 5.1.2600.1217 (SP2) so I guess it would be ok to install it even if I don't have <B>IIS</B> installed, ya think? <br><small>--<br>"in flagrante delicto"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6982361</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 08:02:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6980163</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/191317"><b>bcool</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  subzero57 <A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I just had troubles with Q815021 XP: Security Update. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>This particular patch (Q815021) has been mentioned several times here.  Just want to clarify: Q815021 is only applicable on XP if one is running <B><I>IIS</B></I>?  Otherwise I can ignore this patch, right? or should I?<br><br><BLOCKQUOTE><B>Edit:</B>  After the bad experience with original <I>Q811493</I>, I'm happy to report that the updated patch (5/28/03) installed quietly with no side effects.  Whew!</BLOCKQUOTE><br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-05-29 23:52:45]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6980163</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 22:56:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6980151</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/756449"><b>Keizer</b></A> : I bet because of all the slow down problems on the original patch, MS added a little speed to this new patch to make up for the earlier release! Does this patch even have anything to do with speeding up your pc?  Keizer]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6980151</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 22:55:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6979794</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/166306"><b>Jan Janowski</b></A> : I installed the first (go-slow) patch, but on my system it only slowed it down during Launch of IE or Outlook, maybe 1 to 1.5 sec...<br><br>This new patch DOES improve the launching speed, compared to where it was before patch....<br><br>Running NAV 2002 here.  No increase in speeds that tests I just tried indicate... <br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-05-29 22:21:35]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6979794</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 22:19:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6979721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/167910"><b>nbjb0</b></A> : I have installed the revised patch and the new one both at the same time from windows update. On windows xp sp1. So far it seems to have sped up the computer about 5-8% worth of performance for me. Its also a internet speed increase for me. Also I am running nav 2002 and that seems to be ok as well. I did system restore before installing the patch and recommend that for everyone as results with the patches will vary but as I said its good for me. <br><br>nbjb]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6979721</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 22:11:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6979587</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/679322"><b>Garbs</b></A> : Ok, installed each one, one at-a-time, and so far, no problems at all.<br><br>My surfing speed is a bit faster (although I wouldn't believe it yet), and my programs on my HD load just as fast as prior to patches.<br><br>I'd say these are good-to-go for those of you who are still on the fence.<br><br>No probs here. :D<br><small>--<br> Look! <A HREF="/forum/remark,6180346~root=journals~mode=flat"><B><I>The World According to Garbs?</B></I></A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6979587</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 21:57:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6979337</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/195472"><b>Wxman</b></A> : I will give it a try tomorrow. Will only do one at a time this time around. Probably starting with 811493.<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6979337</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 21:32:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6978553</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/185071"><b>kcazzie</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  MSeng <A HREF="/useremail/u/172037"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> <br><br>FWIW, I installed both updates last night (one at a time, 811493 first) and have experienced no problems at all. I do run NAV2003.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Ditto ... I installed both at the same time on two  PCs---- Both running XP home and Nav 2002...No problems at all ...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6978553</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 20:12:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6978468</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/171340"><b>2kmaro</b></A> : I saw your question earlier when I posted, but I was on a Win2K machine at the time and couldn't look to see if there were clues on the machine.  I wanted to say almost exactly the same thing that  MSeng <A HREF="/useremail/u/172037"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> did - I would imagine that if you've purchased the 64-bit version you'd pretty well know it - and you'd probably have one seriously kick-a$$ machine to run it on!  If you'll use Start/Control Panel then hit Help/About Windows in that menu you should see a display something like what I've put up here - that's what my 32-bit version of XP Pro displays.<br><small>--<br>Man - the animal voted least likely to leave well enough alone.</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/6978468?c=358322&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3I2OTY3NTkzLnhtbA%3D%3D"><IMG TITLE="13523 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=417 HEIGHT=175 SRC="/r0/download/358322~26506a0c718ef34eb3c2287bbef902c7/WinXPInfo.gif"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6978468</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 20:03:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6978334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/229518"><b>kaybertoss</b></A> : Installed both patches, on one XP laptop and on my XP desktop. So far so good.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6978334</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 19:51:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6976007</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/176755"><b>graffixx</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Wxman <A HREF="/useremail/u/195472"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I uninstalled both updates and my HD reappeared. I don't know which one caused the problem, but I will not be installing them again.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>You might try to install one patch at a time.<br><small>--<br><BR>Visit the <A HREF="http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/losangeles">LA/OC</A> forum.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6976007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 15:28:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6975272</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/195472"><b>Wxman</b></A> : I uninstalled both updates and my HD reappeared. I don't know which one caused the problem, but I will not be installing them again. <br><br>Fred]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6975272</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 14:00:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6974400</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/547118"><b>Epyon9283</b></A> : I installed the updates with no problems so far.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6974400</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 12:14:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973609</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/172037"><b>MSeng</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  JeffreyJ <A HREF="/useremail/u/616593"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>How can I tell which version I need 32-bit or 64-bit? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Very few users are running 64 bit. If you purchase XP off a store shelf or if it came pre-installed on a new machine, then you're running the 32 bit version.<br><br>FWIW, I installed both updates last night (one at a time, 811493 first) and have experienced no problems at all. I do run NAV2003.<br><small>--<br>Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark, professionals built the Titanic.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973609</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 10:27:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973557</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/613860"><b>DoubleT</b></A> : Ditto here, no Symantec anything. Running fine with NOD32, TDS-3, and SPFpro on Win XP Home.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973557</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 10:21:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973556</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/166758"><b>hurleyp</b></A> : I installed 811114, 811493 and 815021 this morning on my WinXP Pro laptop and desktop.  Everything works just fine (so far) for me.  I'm running NAV 2003.<br><br>Paul<br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-05-29 10:21:58]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973556</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 10:21:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973544</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/171340"><b>2kmaro</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  RXDOC <A HREF="/useremail/u/599799"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Here's my post install update....after installing 811493 everything is perfect...no problems at all with performance! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Same here.  That system seems to be working just fine - but it has NO Symantec apps on it.<br><small>--<br>Man - the animal voted least likely to leave well enough alone.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973544</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 10:19:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973476</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/616593"><b>JeffreyJ</b></A> : How can I tell which version I need 32-bit or 64-bit?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973476</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 10:07:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973309</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/613860"><b>DoubleT</b></A> : I had problems with the previous version of 811493.<br><br>Reinstalled the new version as well as the 815021 (separately) patch and I can report smooth sailing. No noticeable slowdowns.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973309</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 09:38:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973267</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/195472"><b>Wxman</b></A> : I just installed 811493 and 815021. No problems with the install, but now I cannot see one of my hard drives. My OS is XP Pro with SP1. I had 3 hard drives; 2 13GB and 1 80GB. I can not longer see the 80GB. Still trying to trouble shoot this.<br><br>Fred]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6973267</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 09:30:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972523</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/135892"><b>mrbrimi</b></A> : I had problems to put it politely with the original 811493 and had to remove.<br><br>Smooth sailing with the new version.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972523</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 06:49:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972475</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : Got home from work last night and kicked my friend off my computer for about 30 seconds when I saw the windows update icon in my system tray.  It had 2 critical updates listed which I installed.  I don't know the numbers but they both said they were security updates.  After they were done I did not reboot.  I run a server so I only reboot when 100% necessary and in the middle of the night.  Anyhow, haven't noticed any issues so far.  Haven't tried any of my Norton products either.  Also didn't run the full Windows update to check for normal updates listed.<br><small>--<br>Today I didn't even have to use my AK, I gotta say it was a good day. - Ice Cube www.maxolasersquad.com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972475</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 06:30:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972430</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/599799"><b>RXDOC</b></A> : Here's my post install update....after installing 811493 everything is perfect...no problems at all with performance!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972430</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 06:08:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972415</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/599799"><b>RXDOC</b></A> : This is a release from MS about 811493<br><br>"Why has Microsoft reissued this bulletin? <br><br>Subsequent to the release of this bulletin and the associated patches, a performance related problem was identified with the Windows XP Service Pack 1 version of the patch. This problem is unrelated to the security vulnerability discussed in this bulletin, however the problem has caused some customers to notice performance degradation on Windows XP SP1 systems after applying the patch. <br><br>Microsoft has corrected this problem and re-issued this bulletin on May 28, 2003 to advise on the availability of a revised patch for Windows XP Service Pack 1."<br><small>--<br>Join <A HREF="/forum/disco">Team Discovery TSC</A>! | Support <A HREF="http://www.tdprojecthope.org/">Project Hope</A> A project of <A HREF="/forum/disco">Team Discovery</A>!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972415</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 06:01:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972343</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/761928"><b>DannyZ</b></A> : Absolutely no problems with the patch here]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972343</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 05:23:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972276</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Automatic update? Holding off on security updates? Creating restore points? Man! There sure are a bunch of people who obviously don't know what they're doing on here!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972276</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 04:44:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972031</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/219234"><b>vice8686</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  72245156 <A HREF="/useremail/u/171339"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I just installed them both with no ill effects. Some things actually seem a bit quicker. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Yeah, I wasn't sure if it was just me or not. But things "seem" a little more responsive.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972031</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 03:07:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972004</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/219234"><b>vice8686</b></A> : Just checked Windows Update and q811493 is now listed as a critical update. Gonna try it now.<br><br><U>EDIT:</U><br><br>So far, so good:) No change in performance has occurred.<br><br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-05-29 03:06:40]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6972004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 02:57:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971908</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/171339"><b>72245156</b></A> : I just installed them both with no ill effects. Some things actually seem a bit quicker.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971908</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 02:24:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971871</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/229518"><b>kaybertoss</b></A> : Just did a Windows update and both patches appear under &#147;Critical Updates And Service Packs&#148; now. The First one reads &#133;.. 811493: Security Update (Windows XP) 3.2 MB. The Second one reads &#133;&#133;. Q815021 XP: Security Update 525 KB<br><br>I think I&#146;ll install both patches tomorrow after I check back here one more time to see if anyone is having issues with either of these patches. So far it looks as if there are no major problems in this thread yet, even some systems being liberated. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971871</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 02:13:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971856</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/500875"><b>PeeWee</b></A> : [QUOTE= kaybertoss <A HREF="/useremail/u/229518"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>] <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Keizer <A HREF="/useremail/u/756449"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> What is the number of the update that hosed 600,000 pc users internet connection?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>  <br><br>I believe 811493 slowed a lot of people&#146;s pc to a crawl but I&#146;m not to sure about hosing their internet connections. 811493 is not out yet in Windows Automatic Update.<br><br>  -------------------------------------------<br>That's why sensationalism works. That article referred to 600,000 downloads of the update, not 600,000 hosed computers. We need to read what we see not allow ourselves to be misled buy tabloid headline journalism.<br>I have never had a problem with any updates (Win XP). But I also keep all programs and drivers updated, including latest Nvidea driver windows update complains about. <br>I personally don't like Symantec products, so no problem there.<br><SMALL>--<br>I'm just a fly on the wall in a room full of the best knowledge on the internet!</SMALL><br><br>I forgot to say That I've also loaded All the critical and recommended updates to date including those being discussed here today, No problems.<br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-05-29 02:14:14]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971856</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 02:10:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971720</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/389277"><b>jmacd27</b></A> : I just installed both 811493 and Q815021 and my system seems to be running quicker for me. I created a restore point just incase, but so far things are looking good for me.<br><small>--<br>Don't be <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/canchat">sexist</A> . Broads hate that.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971720</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 01:44:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><b>subzero57</b></A> : The updated 811493 patch is now showing up in Windows Update on my Win XP machine. It's already released. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971555</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 01:18:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971473</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/631895"><b>IzyBella</b></A> : Wow! I just uninstalled that puppy and my 1GB of RAM now acts like it..LOL I was thinking for the longest time that it was my computer and was on the phone with Gateway a few times..LOL Thanks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971473</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 01:07:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971369</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/578590"><b>Mashiki</b></A> : Well it does seem to be okay on this HP machine I'm working on.  Atleast it's not any slower then it was...lol.  I never knew a 1.8ghz machine could be so slow.  Corel and it's bloody always run crud.<br><br>edit: I'm back on my own machine now, it doesn't seem to slow it down at all.  Things are nice and silky anyway, but I'm leary of installing this patches.  I still haven't figured out what one was the one that made my machine turn into a jumpy jitter bug.  It wasn't 811493, tho it did cause it's own problems.  Regardless...the hunt continues...<br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-05-29 01:23:34]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971369</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 00:53:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6970318</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/626550"><b>Try this9</b></A> : Looks like the MS server the patch is residing on now is overwhelmed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6970318</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 22:58:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969926</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/229518"><b>kaybertoss</b></A> : Ah yes Unhygienix, I would like to second that!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969926</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 22:22:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969865</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/229518"><b>kaybertoss</b></A> : Hi 2Kmaro, nice to see you here on the posting board. Please let us know how your patch job goes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969865</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 22:17:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969840</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><b>subzero57</b></A> : This morning I came to my pc and in tools, clicked windows update. Once updated successfully I restarted my computer and walla my Symantec products didn't work and along with a few other programs to boot. So I did a system restore, got everything back as usual. Then I read this thread from Unhygienix stating the 811493 patch was available and downloaded it and it worked fine. So I was just sitting here and wondering what if I just download Q815021 one more time will it work. So I did and everything is fine. I was a bit scared, but I'm over it now. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969840</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 22:15:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969754</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/511014"><b>Unhygienix</b></A> : O yes...I must express my gratitude to Skipdawg, subzero and Graystoke for being the guinea pigs. Brave souls all.<br><small>--<br>Go Leafs Go</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969754</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 22:08:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969745</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/171340"><b>2kmaro</b></A> : I sure would like to get some specifics.  More detail than "everything was freaking out".  I've just finished installing it on this sytem and so far I don't see any obvious problems.  What should I be looking for?<br><small>--<br>Man - the animal voted least likely to leave well enough alone.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969745</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 22:07:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969708</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/511014"><b>Unhygienix</b></A> : Just to clear up where I got this info. I subscribe to Microsoft Product Security Notification Service.<br><br>Info about this service is available here: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/notify.asp" >www.microsoft.com/technet/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;tify.asp</A><br><br>The information on new patches and updates arrives in my inbox via this service usually before it shows up on Windows Update. I like to download the patches first and install later when I am quite sure they pose no problems. This way I can archive them for later use also.<br><br>I had installed the original 811493 patch and experienced the problems discussed in the link I have posted above. I then uninstalled the patch. Problem solved. <br><br>The updated 811493 patch is not showing up in Windows Update on my XP SP1 machine either. This is normal and am sure it will be there in couple days time.<br><small>--<br>Go Leafs Go</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969708</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 22:04:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969662</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/383201"><b>ezebob</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  subzero57 <A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Basically stay away from patch Q815021, that patch messes up everything. I installed this morning and restarted my pc and everything was freaking out. Since then I uninstalled it and put patch 811493 which works just fine.  <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Sorry to hear of your problem but it works fine on my system.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969662</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 22:00:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969622</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/383201"><b>ezebob</b></A> : Installed and no problems, if anything it increased my internet speeds.  They may have got it right this time!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969622</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 21:57:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969296</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><b>subzero57</b></A> : Just a heads up. I just downloaded Q815021 and it seems to be working without any issues. Just so you know I downloaed it this morning and messed up some of my programs. So what I did was install patch 811493 1st after doing a restore and removing Q815021. So I thought I'd give it another chance and my system came back as normal. Just thought I'd let everyone know. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969296</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 21:31:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969204</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/203572"><b>timcuth</b></A> : I just made a restore point, then installed Q815021. No problems are apparent, yet.<br><br>Also, 811493 was not on my list. There was a critical update for Microsoft VM, but I don't use that so I removed it from my list.<br><br>Tim<br><small>--<br>As Milton Berle said, "My wife and I have a perfect understanding. I don't try to run her life and I don't try to run mine."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969204</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 21:24:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969142</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/171340"><b>2kmaro</b></A> : Matter of fact while reading this thread, this machine suffered thru a popup announcing Q815021 - I'm holding off for a few minutes.  But I'm walking across the room to let it be installed on another similar machine and I'll see how it goes over there before letting it "work its magic" on this one.  And yes - it announces as a security update.<br><small>--<br>Man - the animal voted least likely to leave well enough alone.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969142</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 21:19:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/546847"><b>Graystoke2</b></A> : I just installed it on my XP Home. Everything working fine. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6969037</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 21:11:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968783</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/229518"><b>kaybertoss</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Keizer <A HREF="/useremail/u/756449"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> What is the number of the update that hosed 600,000 pc users internet connection?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>  <br><br>I believe 811493 slowed a lot of people&#146;s pc to a crawl but I&#146;m not to sure about hosing their internet connections. 811493 is not out yet in Windows Automatic Update.<br><br>  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Keizer <A HREF="/useremail/u/756449"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> Then there is the new revised 811493 that is supposed to be safe to load now?  Boy....scary.....Keizer.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>After the big mess MS patch 811493 caused I&#146;m a little gun shy! So I&#146;m going to wait until it appears in Windows Update and watch the feed back here. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968783</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 20:49:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968446</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/756449"><b>Keizer</b></A> : Ha...I just got the same knock on my door for Q815021.  There is another thread going that says that paticular update is a recommended update not a critical one. What is the number of the update that hosed 600,000 pc users internet connection? Maybe we should start one thread that keeps all these updates straight so we don't have to surf around and find the facts on differant threads. <br><br>Theres the one you are talking about...Q815021 that subzero says messes things up. Then there is the update that MS pulled...818043 that messed with Norton. Then there is the new revised 811493 that is supposed to be safe to load now?  Boy....scary.....Keizer]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968446</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 20:19:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968330</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/229518"><b>kaybertoss</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Keizer <A HREF="/useremail/u/756449"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I thought Q815021 was a recommended update, not a critical update. So why would windows update "come a knockin" with that paticular patch?  Keizer <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>I booted-up my XP laptop just over an hour a go and Windows Update has patch Q815021 as an Security update, listed under &#147;Critical Updates and Service Packs&#148;. This is why Windows Update came a knockin. Is your patch listed under &#147;Recommended Up-dates&#148;? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968330</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 20:08:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968246</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/756449"><b>Keizer</b></A> : I thought Q815021 was a recommended update, not a critical update. So why would windows update "come a knockin" with that paticular patch?  Keizer]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968246</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 20:00:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968115</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/229518"><b>kaybertoss</b></A> :   <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  subzero57 <A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Basically stay away from patch Q815021, that patch messes up everything. I installed this morning and restarted my pc and everything was freaking out. Since then I uninstalled it and put patch 811493 which works just fine.  <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Windows Automatic update has been quiet ever since Microsoft botched patch 811493. However, Windows Update came a knockin with patch Q815021 today. After reading subzero&#146;s post I think I will hold off until I see some more feed back.<br><br>Anyone else here have the same experience as subzero? <br><br>As far as 811493 goes I think I&#146;ll wait until Microsoft adds it to the Windows Update line-up and watch the feedback here in the meantime.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6968115</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:45:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967951</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/631895"><b>IzyBella</b></A> : For those that downloaded the original one..should we uninstall first before installing the new one? Or should it fix everything without having to uninstall?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967951</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:28:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967837</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><b>subzero57</b></A> : Basically stay away from patch Q815021, that patch messes up everything. I installed this morning and restarted my pc and everything was freaking out. Since then I uninstalled it and put patch 811493 which works just fine. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967837</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:19:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967805</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/620997"><b>DSmithLady</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Skipdawg <A HREF="/useremail/u/372465"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Just installed on both my XP Home and PRO PC's. All is well so far ;)<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>For clarification..Y'all d/l the original update, uninstalled because you had problems and have now installed the revision and have not had any problems?<br><small>--<br>It's really easy to join one of our Cancer fighting teams. <A HREF="/forum/folding"><B> JOIN TEAM HELIX!</B></A> <A HREF="/forum/disco"><B> JOIN TEAM DISCOVERY UD/TSC!</B></A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967805</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:16:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967764</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><b>subzero57</b></A> : Downloaded 811493  patch and my Win XP machine and everything is working well. Thanks for the heads up Unhygienix. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967764</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:12:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967744</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/620997"><b>DSmithLady</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Unhygienix <A HREF="/useremail/u/511014"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I read that post here also subzero. I created restore points before I installed that patch. So far so good.<br><br>As far as the 811493 fiasco... I create restore points before any patching takes place and I always visit here to see if the BBR folks (DSmithlady...hehe )are having problems with any MS patches or updates.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>That's my point...visiting here first is a good idea :)<br><small>--<br>It's really easy to join one of our Cancer fighting teams. <A HREF="/forum/folding"><B> JOIN TEAM HELIX!</B></A> <A HREF="/forum/disco"><B> JOIN TEAM DISCOVERY UD/TSC!</B></A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967744</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:10:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967715</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/511014"><b>Unhygienix</b></A> : I read that post here also subzero. I created restore points before I installed that patch. So far so good.<br><br>As far as the 811493 fiasco... I create restore points before any patching takes place and I always visit here to see if the BBR folks (DSmithlady...hehe )are having problems with any MS patches or updates.<br><small>--<br>Go Leafs Go</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967715</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:08:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967651</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/620997"><b>DSmithLady</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Unhygienix <A HREF="/useremail/u/511014"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Anyone touched this "gem" yet. The original patch drastically slowed my machine and is well documented here in the forums. Wondering if anyone has tried the updated version of the patch?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-013.asp" >www.microsoft.com/technet/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;-013.asp</A><br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Ohh so you want to know about those that took the plunge first? ;)<br><br>I never d/l it on any of my comps because I heard about a possible problem with it from this site, and I was not willing..nor felt it necessary, to take the risk.<br><br>After all that's one of the reasons to frequent a forum like this. :)<br><small>--<br>It's really easy to join one of our Cancer fighting teams. <A HREF="/forum/folding"><B> JOIN TEAM HELIX!</B></A> <A HREF="/forum/disco"><B> JOIN TEAM DISCOVERY UD/TSC!</B></A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967651</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:00:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967635</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/168382"><b>subzero57</b></A> : I just had troubles with Q815021 XP: Security Update. I had to uninstall it. It gave my Symantec products some issues. And also other programs I have wouldn't work. I'm wondering when Microsoft or Symantec will have a fix. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967635</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 18:58:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967619</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/372465"><b>Skipdawg</b></A> : Just installed on both my XP Home and PRO PC's. All is well so far ;)<br><small>--<br>What?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967619</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 18:56:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Updated 811493 Patch</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967593</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/511014"><b>Unhygienix</b></A> : Anyone touched this "gem" yet. The original patch drastically slowed my machine and is well documented here in the forums. Wondering if anyone has tried the updated version of the patch?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-013.asp" >www.microsoft.com/technet/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;-013.asp</A><br><small>--<br>Go Leafs Go</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6967593</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 18:54:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
