<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>What a joke in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r6923305</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:18:27 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:18:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>What a joke</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6923305</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/402849"><b>Jaime</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by article:</SMALL><HR>The backers of the bill would however like to reclassify what qualifies broadband, since the original legislation is a little too rich for their blood; defining broadband as anything over 1.544Mbps. Kennard suggests the industry would like to see that lowered to 200Kbps<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>How can anyone believe that 200Kbps is considered "broadband".  That's just a joke and we know that PA officials must be getting their new Lexus' by now if this happens.<br><small>--<br>"The human mind treats a new idea the way the body treats a strange protein; it rejects it." - P.B Medawar<BR><B><A HREF="http:///forum/bf1942">Join the BBRBF clan</A></B></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6923305</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2003 17:11:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
