<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r5648901</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:52:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:52:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5680653</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/451938"><b>BrianDamage</b></A> : No, beta lost out because Sony wouldn't license it.<br>Toshiba licensed VHS to anybody and everybody.<br>That's why it came out on top. Superiority has nothing to do with it.<br>Video was comparable, but the audio quality of beta was far superior.<br>Arrogance is what sent that format into oblivion.<br><small>--<br>The rich get richer, the poorer get the picture, the bombs never hit you when yer down so low...some got pollution, others evolution, there must be some solution but I just don't know....</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5680653</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:20:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5678504</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Don't forget, Beta largely lost out not simply because it was proprietary, but because the porn industry went with VHS.  With DVD, porn was 7% of titles but 25% of sales in 2001.  Like the Internet, video mediums are driven by porn as well as technology and proprietary issues.  If it was just the proprietary nature of beta, Microsoft would have been out a long time ago.<br><br>Cheers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5678504</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:47:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5661368</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/413670"><b>xrobertcmx</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  BrianDamage <A HREF="/useremail/u/451938"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>You have to be pushy and aggressive.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>I have the office numbers for both his local and DC office:)  I don't mess around, that issue I mentioned put me over the edge.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5661368</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:53:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5661258</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/451938"><b>BrianDamage</b></A> : You have to write many times over before your rep will ever actually see your letter with his/her own eyes.<br>They have legions of assistants to wade through all of the letters.<br>You have to be pushy and aggressive.<br><small>--<br>The rich get richer, the poorer get the picture, the bombs never hit you when yer down so low...some got pollution, others evolution, there must be some solution but I just don't know....</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5661258</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:45:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5660994</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/413670"><b>xrobertcmx</b></A> : I have written congress, the problem is everytime I write I get back a standard response.  It doesn't help.  I wrote Warner once and got back a letter about how proud he was to do the exact oposite.  I now have three copies of a letter I wrote him about, I was saying the letter was moronic. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5660994</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:23:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5659880</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  NOVA_Guy <A HREF="/useremail/u/595625"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>I wasn't necessarily referring to DivX being dead, but what the government did with it.  If I recall correctly, didn't they make hacking DivX copy protection-- or even providing information/instructions or software to do it-- a crime?  That's what I'm opposed to more than anything else.  I see no reason why the government or any media company should feel they have the right to control the storage or playback method of content that I have legally purchased from them. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Restrictions are not specific to DivX. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takes away pretty much all fair use rights granted under Copyright law. Couples that with the Sonny Bono copyright extension act that extends copyright virtually forever and we have rather dire situation,<br><br>If you are concerned about Government intrusion write your Rep and Senators. The media cartel wrote and lobbied for the DMCA because they are scared to death of digital technology and managed to buy enough legislators to get it through Congress.<br><br>If you want to be even more outraged at what Congress and the Industry are doing to fair use take a look at the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.chillingeffects.org/" >www.chillingeffects.org/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5659880</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:50:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5659590</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/595625"><b>NOVA_Guy</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  xrobertcmx <A HREF="/useremail/u/413670"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Call me out of touch, but what happened with DivX?  Is this the DivX DVD disc that floped? or the Codec? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>I wasn't necessarily referring to DivX being dead, but what the government did with it.  If I recall correctly, didn't they make hacking DivX copy protection-- or even providing information/instructions or software to do it-- a crime?  That's what I'm opposed to more than anything else.  I see no reason why the government or any media company should feel they have the right to control the storage or playback method of content that I have legally purchased from them.  If I buy a CD, I've bought a license to listen to the music on it, and should be able to listen to said music on my computer, my car stereo, my MP3 player, my home stereo, etc., etc.  The same with video-- if I buy a movie, it shouldn't matter whether I watch it on VHS, DVD, or rip it and convert it to a format that I can watch on my PocketPC.  But that just isn't the case with DivX... :(<br><small>--<br>Cox cable:  the hallmark questionable business practices and lousy cable service!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5659590</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:28:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5658281</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/483787"><b>Beeper</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  tschmidt <A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>We have two competing forces.<br><br>The technology and communication industry <br><br>vs.<br><br>The 5 mega media corporations represented the RIAA and MPAA <br><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue6_2/odlyzko/" >www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue6_2/odlyzko/</A><br><br>Andrew Odlyzko, formerly from Bell Labs and now at University of Minnesota  makes a point that the phone companies make in two weeks what Hollywood takes in in a full year.<br><br>Compared to the consumer electronics and telecommunication industries, media companies are farts in a whirlwind.<br><small>--<br>Guaranteed Fear and Loathing. Abandon all hope. Prepare for the Weirdness. Get familiar with Cannibalism.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5658281</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:15:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5649751</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/451938"><b>BrianDamage</b></A> : Yeah, as long as whatever standards become standards, they are Sony standards.<br>I question their sincerity.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5649751</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:46:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5649455</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/372725"><b>AkumalDave</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>...unless they work together on <B>industry-wide open standards.</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Are we to assume that SONY has learned their lesson from the BetaMax?  I guess they <I>have</I> licensed other manufacturers for Memory Stick technology, but it took awhile.<br><br>Hey, if they can make broadband as quick, easy and inexpensive as water flowing from the tap - more power to 'em!<br><br>Dave]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5649455</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:23:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5649238</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/413670"><b>xrobertcmx</b></A> : Thanks, I barely remember those disc's on the shelf, but I am familiar with DivX as the mp4 codec.  Seems like every video downloaded is encoded in it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5649238</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:07:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5648901</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/496545"><b>mdmathis6</b></A> : It was the disc....divx is another name for the mp4 codec, so when you see downloads for a divx player, it refers to a media player that will play videos encoded in mp4.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5648901</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:39:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5647799</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/413670"><b>xrobertcmx</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  NOVA_Guy <A HREF="/useremail/u/595625"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> Think it can't be made so?  Just look at the crap that was pulled with DivX.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Call me out of touch, but what happened with DivX?  Is this the DivX DVD disc that floped? or the Codec?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5647799</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:14:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5647001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/595625"><b>NOVA_Guy</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  tschmidt <A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>We have two competing forces.<br><br>The technology and communication industry see widespread deployment of broadband as the driver of new business opportunity....<br><br>vs.<br><br>The 5 mega media corporations represented the RIAA and MPAA that are deathly afraid of losing control of the distribution channel....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>You may have framed the competing sides to this debate properly, but you have forgotten the relative sizes of the two industries.<br><br>The revenue of all technology companies combined far outweighs the combined revenue of all RIAA member companies.  Let's face it:  if the technology sector formed an alliance similar to the RIAA and decided that DRM was a bad thing, Rosen and her thugs would be handily defeated.<br><br>I believe that the rumblings we heard last year from the technology industry that were somewhat directed at the music industry is just a first.  I think that when the technology industry-- and consumers-- get a full picture of what the MPAA and RIAA want, there will be a massive cry about fair use rights.  I just hope this full picture doesn't come into focus too late for most stakeholders involved.<br><br>The RIAA and MPAA aren't necessarily opposed to everyone having a broadband connection; they are just opposed to the free movement of their "property" without their explicit "permission" at any time.  If both organizations had their way, this would likely include the total control of content delivered over radio, television, pay-per-view, movie rentals, and anything else media-related.  I can easily see them pushing for a world in which content is encrypted and digitally delivered to a device in your home, which checks to ensure that you are authorized to view the delivered content prior to showing it.<br><br>The MPAA would finally be able to prevent people from copying movies when they rent them.  The RIAA would possibly be able to prevent people from copying songs off the radio.  And traditional non-copy-protected CDs, of course, would not be playable on the new "trusted" DRM-compliant systems.  Hacking any of these new systems, or supplying help, technical information, etc. about these systems would be deemed a crime.  Think it can't be made so?  Just look at the crap that was pulled with DivX.<br><small>--<br>Cox cable:  the hallmark questionable business practices and lousy cable service!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5647001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:07:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5646447</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/451938"><b>BrianDamage</b></A> : Agreed. I'm quite sure that the MPAA/RIAA will do everything they can to stop this idea dead in it's tracks.<br>BTW, this is the same convention where Mike Powell praised his TiVo, calling it "God's machine".<br>Can you imagine the ruffling of feathers with the MPAA's ilk?<br>LMAO........<br><small>--<br>The rich get richer, the poorer get the picture, the bombs never hit you when yer down so low...some got pollution, others evolution, there must be some solution but I just don't know....</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5646447</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:06:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5646444</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/502106"><b>kba4</b></A> : i'd have to say Sony is a rare breed; they're in both 'camps' and are innovating their way through to the future.  other than their failed sdmi, sony has really been one of the only CE companies i know of that thinks so progressively.  either way they're making money (selling media (movies/music) or selling consumer electronics), so unless they pull some new drm crap now, their future looks bright to me.<br><small>--<br>roadrunner is a good name for the service; i don't remember one cartoon where we actually like the rr character :)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5646444</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:06:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5645900</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/562588"><b>thecapn20003</b></A> : Sure then can sue...but how can they force them to show up in court?...and then how do you enforce any court ruling?...This should be fun to watch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5645900</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:08:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5645723</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : A lot of Japanese companies are kind of schizophrenic about DRM. The content guys want to lock it down; the hardware guys want to sell widgets.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5645723</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:46:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5645655</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Sony is a member (i.e. they ARE) of the RIAA and MPAA. What this means is they have DRM measures nearly in place to stop piracy. So, now they will "allow" broadband to be recognized as having a future. Or something to that effect. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5645655</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:38:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Not if the RIAA and MPAA can prevent it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5645541</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : We have two competing forces.<br><br>The technology and communication industry see widespread deployment of broadband as the driver of new business opportunity. Unknown artists are also in this camp because high speed digital communication allows them to bypass the gatekeepers of the current system. But since they are by &#147;unknown&#148; no one really cares about the next generation of artistic expression.<br><br>vs.<br><br>The 5 mega media corporations represented the RIAA and MPAA that are deathly afraid of losing control of the distribution channel. They and their bought and paid for legislators in Washington will do there utmost to kill high speed digital communication as a threat to legacy business models. <br><br>The buggy whip manufactures are taking on the infant automobile industry and they may possible win.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5645541</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:27:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
