<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Goody in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r4449340</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:36:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:36:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Goody</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,4766884</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/571773"><b>elboomboom</b></A> : AT&T will label them a thief............They always do.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,4766884</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2002 03:10:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Goody</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,4449340</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/454515"><b>banditws6</b></A> : So now it's official; great, I'm sure the consumer is really going to win in this latest meld.  Does this mean a Comcast customer who is using a router to share access with their wife or children is going to be labeled a "service thief"?  (Per AT&T's terms of service...)<br><br>The bigger they become, the further we get to bend over.<br><small>--<br>"I'll follow the law until it's just stupid." -Ted Nugent</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,4449340</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:53:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
