 covfam join:2012-03-05 Black River Falls, WI | reply to BF69
Re: Simple Solution Satelite internet is worse than lousy,i had wildblue on my farm and according to everyone i got a "great" signal yes i consistantly got 15,000 to 25,000 Ms latency, that means regardless of internet speed (i had 8meg service) all you could do was check your email and look at internet pages that had little or no pictures, and could never use ANY type of video like you tube, cnn, hell most advertizements pretty much killed basic internet reading. with that kind of latency it make internet viewing so slow dialup feels faster. plus with those HUGE latencies you never know if your "click" actually went through plus the 10-25 gig caps on most satelite services prevent you from downloading any games/video/music for offline use. we gave up and went dialup untill we got out 756k dsl service from centurytell wich was MASSIVLY better than our so called 8 meg satelite service. |
|
 Simba7I Void Warranties join:2003-03-24 Billings, MT | Oh, I've dealt with satellite. Back when HughesNet was "DirecWay", I couldn't even download a Linux ISO without getting FAP'd. Hell, standard Windows updates made short work of the bucket they give you everyday.
Only thing it was good for was, maybe, checking your email or running an IM. |
|
 | Dialup is quite satisfactory for email. |
|
 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| reply to covfam What would you have the satellite ISP's do? They cannot repeal the laws of physics. It takes the signal a certain amount of time to travel back and forth between the satellite in the sky and the ground. There is no way around that. Either live with it or don't subscribe to it. |
|
 Simba7I Void Warranties join:2003-03-24 Billings, MT | said by john262:What would you have the satellite ISP's do? They cannot repeal the laws of physics. It takes the signal a certain amount of time to travel back and forth between the satellite in the sky and the ground. Sure, the latency sucks. At least give a reasonable cap, then. Give the users options of 100, 300, and 500GB caps. 20GB is pathetic. -- Bresnan 30M/5M | CenturyLink 5M/896K MyWS[PnmIIX3@3.2G,8G RAM,500G+1.5T+2T HDDs,Win7] WifeWS[A64@2G,2G RAM,120G HDD,Win7] Router[2xP3@1G,2G RAM,18G HDD,Allied Telesyn AT2560FX,2xDigital DE504,Sun X1034A,2xSun X4444A,SMC 8432BTA,Gentoo] |
|
|
|
 covfam join:2012-03-05 Black River Falls, WI | reply to john262 satelite customers only exist still because the cable & telecom industry refuse to expand thier coverage yet they pay many millions of dollars to lobby state legistlators into making laws or puting walls of red tape making it difficult for new isp's to pop up in those areas, this issue is particularly bad in south carolina, wisconsin. for example this year the university of wisconsin was quite upset with the lack of AT&T coverage that was promised in a deal to connect all the campuses with high speed internet calling it badgernet well after many years later at&t only covers 30% of the campuses and refuses to complete the rollout. so university of wisconsin decided to build thier own... well at&t spent massive amounts of money to get legislators to make it impossible for university of wisconsin to do. once LET cellphone coverage gets better people will be able to get as much data cap and faster seed and less latency than Satelite can give and not cost much more than satelite now! |
|
 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| reply to Simba7 There is only a finite amount of bandwidth available from their satellites. And launching additional satellites requires years of planning and millions of dollars of investments as well as regulatory approval. They don't have the capacity to be able to offer bigger caps unfortunately. |
|
 Simba7I Void Warranties join:2003-03-24 Billings, MT | said by john262:There is only a finite amount of bandwidth available from their satellites. And launching additional satellites requires years of planning and millions of dollars of investments as well as regulatory approval. They don't have the capacity to be able to offer bigger caps unfortunately. Bandwidth != Caps. It's been proven time and time again. If that were the case, why not lower their packet priority instead of slowing them down to 128k for the rest of the month if they go over their cap? -- Bresnan 30M/5M | CenturyLink 5M/896K MyWS[PnmIIX3@3.2G,8G RAM,500G+1.5T+2T HDDs,Win7] WifeWS[A64@2G,2G RAM,120G HDD,Win7] Router[2xP3@1G,2G RAM,18G HDD,Allied Telesyn AT2560FX,2xDigital DE504,Sun X1034A,2xSun X4444A,SMC 8432BTA,Gentoo] |
|