 RR ConductorNWP RR Inc.,serving NW CAPremium
join:2002-04-02
Redwood Valley, CA
kudos:1 | reply to BF69
Re: Simple Solution said by BF69:said by battleop:Give WISPs what they need. The need spectrum and decent power to overcome line of sight problems.
Then prevent AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, etc from obtaining this spectrum so they can't squat on it.
Give? more free government handouts? Yeah, you know, to actually help the nation prosper, as opposed to free trillions to countries that don't even want us there, or money to the elite to make them even more elite.
--
»www.amtrak.com
»www.freightrailworks.org
»www.isu.edu
»www.nwprr.net
»www.amtrakcalifornia.com
»www.cahighspeedrail.gov |
|
|
|
 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by RR Conductor:said by BF69:said by battleop:Give WISPs what they need. The need spectrum and decent power to overcome line of sight problems.
Then prevent AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, etc from obtaining this spectrum so they can't squat on it.
Give? more free government handouts? Yeah, you know, to actually help the nation prosper, as opposed to free trillions to countries that don't even want us there, or money to the elite to make them even more elite. But why just WISPs as battleop states? Isn't that the government picking winners and losers? |
|
CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picturePremium
join:2011-08-11
NYC
kudos:1 Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
| Well who are the winners and losers? Are the cell companies 'winners' simply because they had the money to bid on their spectrum? Being rich doesn't mean you have the best plan... only that you squeeze the most out of your customers.
I wouldn't have a problem loaning spectrum to WISPs with the agreement that they make certain progress within a given time frame or lose the spectrum to someone else. |
|
