republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
70
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


MooJohn

join:2005-12-18
Milledgeville, GA
Reviews:
·Windstream

What is the cost of accusation?

If a customer has to pay $35 to contest it, shouldn't the accuser have to pay $35 for every IP accused of infringing?

I've said it before: why do we accept the word of any interested party when it comes to who is infringing? We wouldn't believe them if they claimed to spin straw into gold so why would we take a list of IPs based on their word?

You can't supply the court a list of license plate numbers and say "All these cars were speeding this morning. Cite the owners!"
--
John M - Cranky network guy

Rekrul

join:2007-04-21
Milford, CT
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

said by MooJohn:

I've said it before: why do we accept the word of any interested party when it comes to who is infringing? We wouldn't believe them if they claimed to spin straw into gold so why would we take a list of IPs based on their word?

You can't supply the court a list of license plate numbers and say "All these cars were speeding this morning. Cite the owners!"

Because everyone must bow down to the Church of Copyright. Infringement is the new heresy and it must be stamped out at all costs or the world will descent into chaos!!!

Wednesday, 22-May 13:14:12 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics