site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

CXM_Splicer
Looking at the bigger picture
Premium
join:2011-08-11
NYC
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

reply to pnh102

Re: FCCs removes rules forcing cable sell content to Sat &Telcos

I agree that they shouldn't have been allowed to merge but how do you see this as a creation of government?!?! Do you somehow think that if government wasn't involved in the process at all they wouldn't have merged? This is clearly a creation of big business... not government.

Certainly there is a conflict of interest when distributors merge with/buy out content creators. This rule removal is anti-consumer as the conglomerates can now exploit this conflict of interest to hinder competition. The way to handle this is to restrict infrastructure companies (Time Warner, Verizon, Comcast, AT&T, etc.) to only providing a pipe, not allow the selling of content.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by CXM_Splicer:

I agree that they shouldn't have been allowed to merge but how do you see this as a creation of government?!?!

The government approved the merger. That is why I describe this as a creation of government. This merger would have been the ideal time to apply some anti-trust laws to protect consumers.

See? I'm not completely anti-government.
--
Romney/Ryan 2012 - Put a couple of mature adults in charge.

Saturday, 25-May 06:23:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics