 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | Shouldn't APPLE be paying these overages? Why should Verizon have to eat the cost since it's Apple bug? |
|
slckusrPremium
join:2003-03-17
Maumee, OH
kudos:1 Reviews:
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| said by BF69:Why should Verizon have to eat the cost since it's Apple bug?
I guess Verizon is crediting them off because its not really costing them money to do? Maybe a partial admission that the tiers are what they seem, for profit. |
|
BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by slckusr: Maybe a partial admission that the tiers are what they seem, for profit. You mean Verizon is in business to make money? Man I though businesses got started to give people free shit just to be nice. |
|
| said by BF69:said by slckusr: Maybe a partial admission that the tiers are what they seem, for profit. You mean Verizon is in business to make money? Man I though businesses got started to give people free shit just to be nice. you can turn a profit while being REASONABLE to the customer. The data allowances could be a bit more fairer to the customer. |
|
| reply to BF69
Who cares? The important thing is that it isn't the customer's problem and should be worked out between the "big boys". |
|
elray
join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA | reply to slckusr
said by slckusr:said by BF69:Why should Verizon have to eat the cost since it's Apple bug?
I guess Verizon is crediting them off because its not really costing them money to do? Maybe a partial admission that the tiers are what they seem, for profit. Nope. Verizon is just doing what big companies should do: protect their clients. They'll collect a small, quiet settlement from Apple, but they're not going to burn their goodwill with premium customers. |
|
