 dib22
join:2002-01-27
Kansas City, MO | ummm Defendant had a duty to secure his Internet connection.
 |
|
| When did the defendant become an ISP? |
|
WHT
join:2010-03-26
Rosston, TX
kudos:5 | reply to dib22
said by dib22:When did that law pass
I'm pondering that also. |
|
Kamus
join:2011-01-27
El Paso, TX | reply to hottboiinnc
said by hottboiinnc:When did the defendant become an ISP?
When did the ISP get a black shirt? (just following your logic here) |
|
| The ISP has always been part of Safe Harbor. The same as Google. until that router owner becomes an ISP they should not be granted safe harbor. |
|
|
|
| reply to dib22
said by dib22:Defendant had a duty to secure his Internet connection.
When did that law pass Got me beat. If such is the case, almost every public library on the face of the continental United States is royally Frakked. |
|
CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picturePremium
join:2011-08-11
NYC
kudos:1 | reply to hottboiinnc
But you just said that ANYONE can be an ISP... even if they give it away for free. Have you looked at the definition of ISP under federal law? |
|
| reply to hottboiinnc
My city provides free wireless in downtown. Bought from Bright House/RR. So...who is at fault now? Keep downloading and let city fight lawsuits? I guess my city and many around it that have public WiFi are huge negligent entities? Please...
Your analogies make no sense. How a user uses a tool should not have any consequences to the tool seller or maker. |
|
