republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


RR Conductor
NWP RR Inc.,serving NW CA
Premium
join:2002-04-02
Redwood Valley, CA
kudos:1

reply to Lone Wolf

Re: But

said by Lone Wolf:

People still flock to Verizon to get a discounted phone and pay 2 to 3 times what I pay monthly.

Makes no sense.

BTW, since last November, Sprint stock more than doubled. Watch out Verizon!

One word, coverage, Verizon has more of it, and more of that is 3G and 4G than any other carrier. Sprint is no contender to Verizon, you should see Sprint's lousy coverage in NorCal, or should I say lousy un coverage (they don't even cover my county of Mendocino). Yep, in NorCal if you want good coverage, Verizon, AT&T and U.S. Cellular are the best choices, T-Mobile would be next. Sprint might be okay in urban areas, outside of there forget it, and the majority of the land mass in the US is NOT urban, or even suburban.
--
»www.amtrak.com
»www.freightrailworks.org
»www.isu.edu
»www.nwprr.net
»www.amtrakcalifornia.com
»www.cahighspeedrail.gov


n2jtx

join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY

I have no interest in giving money to either VZW or AT&T but I have to admit the VZW network does work well. Both my sister and I have iPhone 4S's. She's on VZW and I am on Sprint. Side by side she was able to browse and do things with 3G data while my phone barely moved. Her phone behaved like it was on WiFi (but we had that turned off for comparison). My Sprint service is paid for by my employer so I cannot really complain but if I had to pay for Sprint out of my own pocket, I would go to another provider or get a phone that did not require a data plan.
--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.


Thursday, 23-May 03:25:56 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics